« Don Berna in custody | Main | Censuring the defense minister »

June 01, 2005

The Challenge of Neutrality in Northern Cauca

(This is the first posting from the CIP Colombia Program's summer intern, Marcela Guerrero.)

The Paez indigenous community of northern Cauca department, in southwestern Colombia, is under fire from both the FARC and the government. While the former has continously attacked their principal towns since April 14, the latter accuses them of complicity with guerrillas and has begun a campaign of mass arrests. The 85,000-member community, known in its own language as the Nasa, is divided into 13 reservations and 2 civilian communities (individually or collectively owned lands not considered reservations) located in seven municipalities (counties) of northern Cauca (Jambaló, Toribío, Caloto, Santander de Quilichao, Buenos Aires, Corinto and Miranda). They elect their own leaders and have gained several mayoral posts in nearby towns. They govern according to “Life Projects” (Proyectos de Vida), which encompass development through participatory governance, agriculture and small enterprises. Their political and judicial procedures involve public assemblies and other participatory bodies. As northern Cauca has been a conflictive zone for decades, the community has sought to secure itself through a non-violent model rooted in centuries-old tradition: an “indigenous guard” of about 9,000 members (3,200 in northern Cauca), armed only with symbolic ceremonial staffs, that has successfully confronted armed groups’ harassment and incursions. This peaceful approach has brought national and international recognition to the Nasa and has won them the Equator Prize from the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and two national peace prizes.

Indigenous people throughout Colombia have been particularly vulnerable to the conflict. Many of their leaders have been threatened and killed, their communities have been displaced and their declared position of neutrality has not been respected by either the government or armed groups. Nevertheless, the Nasa continue to demonstrate strong cohesion and resilience. Committed to a non-violent strategy, the Nasa have mobilized thousands of people to demonstrate against the conflict, human rights violations, free trade agreements with the U.S., and on September 7th of last year, to confront the FARC and successfully rescue some of their leaders who had been kidnapped.

The latest events began to unfold on April 14 when several hundred guerrillas from the FARC’s 6th Front and Jacobo Arenas Column attacked Toribío, a Nasa town of about 3,500 people. The guerrillas indiscriminately rained homemade gas-cylinder bombs on the town, damaging the police station that the Uribe government had installed, but also destroying a hospital and dozens of houses. Fighting between the FARC and government forces displaced approximately 6,000 people. As fighting continued in and around Toribío, the FARC attacked the nearby town of Jambaló on April 21st, and more people were displaced.

These events worsened a strained relationship between the Nasa and the Uribe government. Uribe refuses to accept the group’s desire to exclude all armed actors, including government forces, from its communities. In 2003, the government – which has made a great effort to place at least a small police presence in all of Colombia’s 1,092 municipalities – installed a police station, surrounded by sandbags, right in the middle of the town’s population center despite residents’ strong protests that the town would attract attacks. As predicted, the FARC attacked and troops were sent in to reinforce the police; however, it took a couple of weeks to get the FARC out of the town centers of Toribío, Jambaló and Tacueyó. These are not only the longest confrontations in many years, since the FARC usually attacks and quickly retreats, but they show that the Uribe government – which has made a big show out of installing police in all municipalities – was not prepared to defend these police, and the towns in which they were stationed, in the event of a concerted guerrilla attack.Arriving by helicopter, President Uribe paid a brief visit to Toribío on April 15, in which he called the FARC “cowards,” pledged to keep the security forces in the town, and sought to rally community support for his strategy. On April 30, Uribe presided over a community council meeting in Santander de Quilichao (Cauca); however, his words were not well received and the meeting ended as indigenous leaders got up and left the room.

While finding themselves caught in the middle of FARC attacks, the Nasa are now also subject to government accusations that some community members collaborated with the FARC. On May 22, the director of the DAS (Colombia’s equivalent of the FBI), Hector Ortíz, told Medellín’s El Colombiano that “we will prove that there are indeed indigenous people involved with subversive groups as militants, informants and combatants.” These allegations followed earlier statements by Defense Minister Jorge Alberto Uribe, who affirmed that the attack in Toribío was facilitated by indigenous residents, and by Peace Commissioner Luis Carlos Restrepo, who publicly questioned the neutraility of both the Nasa and the peace community of San José de Apartadó, which also seeks to exclude all armed actors.

A campaign of massive arrests ensued. On May 19, the indigenous leadership issued a statement denouncing an operation carried out by the “José Hilario López Batallion [of the Colombian army], the DAS, the Fiscalía [attorney-general’s office] and the police.” The statement indicates that on that day, DAS searched six indigenous leaders’ residences in nearby Caldono and claimed to have found explosives. The leaders insist that DAS agents planted the items themselves in order to incriminate local indigenous political leaders. Among the subjects of the house searches was Vicente Otero, a former mayor of Caldono and a leader in the Nasa communities’ nonbinding March-6th referendum against a free trade agreement with the United States. Otero’s house was searched while he was away and only his 11 year old son and disabled brother were present. Documents and much personal information were removed.

Indigenous groups have admitted that after three decades of FARC presence it is inevitable that some members have developed relationships, though on the whole the guerrillas – whose rigid Marxism sees no role for indigenous identity – have very poor relations with the Nasa. The general perception, as expressed by the Regional Indigenous Council of Cauca (CRIC), is that the government has indiscriminately labeled indigenous communities in this region as FARC sympathizers, an excuse it uses to settle political scores against community leaders who may disagree with its policies. Furthermore, although the government charges that some indigenous members are FARC sympathizers, the weekly magazine Semana asserts that the indigenous organization has in fact been the only real obstacle to FARC control of northern Cauca.

DAS regional director Hector Ortiz claims that while 200 arrests were announced the week before the searches, they were not exclusively directed toward the Nasa. This clarification comes after his vow to find indigenous collaborators was made widely public in the Colombian media, and the Nasa leadership began to sound the alarm both nationally and internationally.Meanwhile, the Colombian government has attempted to justify its actions by emphasizing the strong presence of FARC members in the region, as well as the widespread cultivation of coca and poppies (63% of Cauca municipalities according to government figures). However, Uribe’s open defiance of the Nasa people’s expressed will has strengthened the notion that Colombian indigenous groups are being targeted politically, due to their position of impartiality in the armed conflict as well as their success in challenging government policies through peaceful demonstrations and their “Life Projects”.

The Nasa population’s non-violent defense of their sovereignty against all armed groups has brought much domestic and internatinal attention. In an interview with Pacifica Radio’s “Democracy Now,” former Toribío mayor Ezequiel Vitonás recalled that a resistance movement is active in his town, as well as in the rest of Northern Cauca. Civil society has put forth a movement, he asserts, that dates back to 1971 – or even 1701, when reservations were formed and lands were given to communities to be administered according to their needs and customs.Mr. Vitonás is currently on a tour of the United States to raise awareness about what is happening in his community, hosted by the American Friends Service Committee. He requests that the U.S. government stop providing military aid for Colombia’s war, and instead fund development, humanitarian and governance efforts to help his people and other Colombians.His visit achieved some success in New York, where the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of Indigenous People, Rodolfo Stavenhagen reiterated his concern for the situation of indigenous people in Colombia. In a report issued last year, Mr. Stavenhagen acknowledged that conditions have deteriorated, going as far as to characterize the situation of indigenous people in Colombia as “ethnocide.” Mr. Vitonás and his companion Manuel Rozental believe this recognition is a step in the right direction. However, they are calling for international presence and pressure to raise widespread awareness about their issues. They hope to see an international delegation, led by the Special Rapporteur, visit Colombia and verify the current situation. In order to reach this goal, they call for better coordination among NGOs and for a legal framework to pressure the Colombian government to change its policies and ultimately to hold it accountable.

Posted by isacson at June 1, 2005 10:36 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://ciponline.org/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/95

Comments

An interesting piece, overall. Though I wouldn't say that the matter is of a political nature, but rather that of ideological and security concerns (a small but important difference).

Still, realistically, there's little to no chance that U.S. military aid will be stopped completely, at least not in the medium term. What can be argued more effiently is that the aid should become much less military-focused, and that a fair amount of the funds can be redirected to social and economic projects to help communities such as the Nasa and others.

The Colombian government is definitely stumbling, as documented here and also in the Semana article, because it is trying to pressure the indigenous to abandon their neutrality and assume a de facto alliance, or else. Not surprisingly, that's not working out.

Instead of doing that, I'd believe that it would be more positive for all parties if there was a greater degree of collaboration and understanding, which could mean allowing the indigenous authorities themselves to handle the cases of individuals which may apparently have provided inside help to FARC guerrillas, on their own term, and the government's being less heavy handed about the matter.

I must admit that I have some problems with the word "ethnocide", because it appears to be used in a political manner and not as an accurate description of a very complex situation.

Posted by: jcg at June 1, 2005 01:25 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?