« Doing yard work for the cameras | Main | Putumayo's white elephant, or how not to win hearts and minds »

August 26, 2006

Gen. Padilla's record

Gen. PadillaOn August 15, newly re-inaugurated President Uribe made changes to the Colombian military's high command. The new chief of the armed forces is Gen. Nelson Freddy Padilla, who has been in Colombia's army since 1966.

A look at this 40-year career makes clear that Gen. Padilla won't be receiving any human rights awards anytime soon.

  • From 1993 to 1995, Padilla headed the Colombian Army's feared 20th Brigade, which consolidated military intelligence activities until 1998, when it was abolished, in part due to strong human rights concerns. The State Department's 1997 human rights report noted, "Government and military officials give credence to reports of isolated killings during the year conducted by members of at least one army unit, the 20th Intelligence Brigade." Added a 1998 Human Rights Watch report, "The Twentieth Brigade is also implicated in the killing of human rights defenders, among them Jesús María Valle, president of the “Héctor Abad Gómez” Permanent Human Rights Committee of Antioquia, and Eduardo Umaña, a noted human rights lawyer."

  • In 1998, Padilla replaced Gen. Jaime Uscátegui as chief of the army's 7th Brigade, based in Villavicencio, Meta. Uscátegui is still being tried for his role in allowing a massive paramilitary massacre in Mapiripán, Meta in 1997. Mapiripán was the AUC's first real foray into the guerrilla-dominated coca-growing areas of southern Colombia, and the paramilitaries' takeover of major towns in the 7th Brigade's area of operations continued during Padilla's tenure in 1998. According to a joint report by Amnesty, WOLA and Human Rights Watch, "In July 2000, the press widely reported that the Procuraduría formally charged (pliego de cargos)" Padilla and two other officers "with 'omission' in connection with the massacre in Puerto Alvira," a town in Meta, in June 1998.

  • From 1998 to 2000, Padilla headed the 2nd Brigade, with responsibility over the cities of Barranquilla and Santa Marta, and surrounding areas along Colombia's Caribbean coast. During this period, paramilitary leaders Rodrigo Tovar ("Jorge 40") and Hernán Giraldo strengthened their dominance over territory and drug trafficking in the brigade's area of operations, with little or no opposition from the armed forces.

  • In letters to President Uribe written in 2004 and 2005, the Catholic Diocese of Quibdó, the capital of Chocó department near Panama, denounced a consistent pattern of "obvious tolerance, connivance and complicity" between the armed forces and paramilitary groups. (Last year, the Diocese received the National Peace Prize, a prestigious award given by Germany's Friedrich Ebert Foundation and several of Colombia's top media outlets.)

    The armed forces responded late last year by sending a special commission to Chocó to investigate the allegations of collaboration with paramilitaries. The commission was headed by Gen. Freddy Padilla. It found nothing - which is sort of like going to Las Vegas and finding no evidence of gambling. According to one local leader from Chocó with whom I spoke earlier this year, Gen. Padilla's commission "investigated" by holding large public meetings, with paramilitary allies no doubt present, in which they asked the assembled crowd, "Has anyone here seen any cooperation between the military and paramilitaries? No? Good."

    A brief report posted to a Colombian military website noted only that Gen. Padilla's commission heard "the population's request that the armed forces stay present in the zones affected by violent groups." Gen. Padilla's "investigation," noted Quibdó's bishop, Msgr. Fidel León Cadavid, had "no result."

This record does not reflect well on Gen. Freddy Padilla's concern for human rights and the rule of law. But it is also not unusual among top military officialdom - many careers are full of postings in charge of notorious units or in zones of paramilitary expansion, with no "smoking gun" to indicate the officer's direct involvement in human rights crimes.

Nonetheless, it speaks volumes about Colombia's supposedly "reformed" military institution that a career path like Gen. Padilla's can still guarantee a quick promotion to the very top.

Posted by isacson at August 26, 2006 9:54 AM

Comments

That may well be so. But one of the things worth keeping is mind is that the Colombian Army currently has a shortage of Generals and other senior positions, to the point that there is open talk of shortening the duration of officer training courses.

Something that obviously contributed to that scenario was Uribe's dismissal of four top Generals a year or two ago, if you would remember, due to disagreements about the creation of joint commands (not to mention that the incident would be partially responsible for Padilla's eventual quick promotion as well, in hindsight).

In such a situation, one has to wonder if it would be that easy to retire or remove every single officer who has ever been posted to areas of paramilitary influence or where human rights abuses have been committed. In other words, if every single officer who has ever been accused of omission were to be dismissed, the number of officers would be drastically reduced even further, to say the least. That may sound great and moralistic on paper, but in practice that would enormously handicap the daily organization and functioning of any army around the world under similar conditions.

Personally, although Gen. Padilla's record may not deserve anything resembling a human rights award (though, as you pointed out, there is no smoking gun linking him to any outright violation on his part), what remains to be seen is what will he do or not do from now on.

His publicly denouncing a false kidnapping committed by GAULA personnel seems like a decent start, IMHO.

Posted by: jcg [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 26, 2006 1:13 PM

Well, in the laberinthine world of official and non-official connections in Colombia, it's hard to know what Padilla knew or didn't know about various human rights violations. It's tempting, of course, to assume that he did know about connivance between his subordinate officers and the paramilitaries.

My question would be, "What kind of a record does he have as a soldier and a general?" If Padilla can finally defeat the FARC, perhaps Uribe made a good choice.

My own personal preference as a non-Colombian living safely in the U.S. would be for a vigorous prosecution of the war against the FARC--eliminating them as a viable fighting organization. At the same time, I'm in favor of radically expanded social programs that will meet the basic nutrition and even some health needs of the poorest Colombians.

Can the Colombian economy afford such military and social expeditures at the same time? Without taking time to look up supporting statistics, my informed guess is, "Yes--at least in the short run." Of course, in the longer perspective, only peace and prosperity will provide funds needed for social development.

I guess I'm advocating a combination of the sword and the olive branch. Probably Uribe and I are in agreement of the "sword" part; but I'm afraid he may not be willing to extend the "olive branch."

To me personally, generation after generation of civil war seems intolerable. Of course, it's up to Colombians to decide their own destiny.

Posted by: richtiger [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2006 1:34 AM

hello nice blog

Posted by: skuba [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2006 3:04 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?