Agenda
for the ECDET Meeting, April 26th,
at
the Carnegie Endowment in
Washington, D.C.
**The
meeting will be held from 2:00 - 6:00 in the upstairs Root Room of the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1779 Mass. Ave., NW Washington,
DC). It will be followed by a cash bar reception.
First
Session
2 p.m.:
Wayne Smith will chair the first session. This will consist principally
of reports from task force members, with questions and comments at the
end of each report. Phil Brenner will lead off with an account
of his conversations with the State Department with respect to the possible
"voluntary" removal of the new restrictions on academic travel
(possibilities which appear to be dim if nonexistent).
Prof Cynthia McClintock, the head of the task force for legislative
approaches, will then introduce Bob Muse, our lawyer, who will
report on the bill which Senator Craig (R-Id) will just have introduced
or will be on the verge of introducing - a bill to remove all the new
restrictions on academic exchanges and educational travel. Bob will indicate
what members can most usefully do to support this bill and see to it that
it moves forward in the Senate, and that a companion bill is introduced
in the House. One of the principal things will be to get college and university
presidents to write senators and congressmen urging their support for
this specific legislation. Involving university board members, many of
whom have considerable influence, could also be useful.
Prof McClintock will then introduce Mavis Anderson, of LAWG, who
will report on efforts to present amendments before both houses calling
for the neutralization or lifting of travel controls across the board,
not simply on educational travel. With Cuba Action Day in mind, Mavis
will also give a few pointers on lobbying Congress.
Bob Muse will take the floor again to report on where we stand with litigation.
As indicated in earlier reports, we are moving to take the federal government
to court and demand that it remove the new restrictions on academic exchanges
and educational travel. We hope that by the 26th, Johns Hopkins and American
University will have signed on as our first plaintiffs. We will then be
looking for other colleges and universities whose Cuba programs have been
curtailed by the new regulations to sign on as additional plaintiffs.
Bob Muse will explain the process and indicate what members can do to
help - to bring their institutions aboard if appropriate and to support
the litigation in other ways if not.
Wayne Smith will then report on where we stand with our membership drive
and on plans for the future.
Second
Session
Les McCabe
will then take over as chair for the second session. Following on our
last discussion in the first session, he wants to say a few words about
how we might recruit new members through professional organizations, conferences,
etc. and the usefulness of targeting professional conferences with presentations
on the Cuba educational travel issue. Les will also discuss the need to
have op-eds and articles published about interruptions in Cuba educational
travel and will have some pointers on how best to do that.
The floor will then be open for comments and suggestions. Some
members will doubtless wish to talk about and ask for advice as to how
to best to make their presence felt on Cuban Action Day, especially as
to how best to lobby their congressional representatives. Also, for those
members who have ideas as to how ECDET might be better organized and directed
or as to new initiatives it should be undertaking, now will be your chance
to have your say without fear of interruption.
Without fear of interruption, that is, until 6 p.m. when the cash bar
will open and a more convivial atmosphere will immediately pervade the
meeting hall. Networking and just plain getting to know one another is
an important element of this meeting which we hope will be enhanced during
the cocktail hour.
Email:
cubaintern@ciponline.org
ECDET
seeks to end the academic travel restrictions to Cuba. The coalition
works to fight against the violations of academic freedoms.
|
|