Statement
of General Charles E. Wilhelm, commander-in-chief, U.S. Southern Command
STATEMENT
OF GENERAL CHARLES E. WILHELM, UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
COMMANDER IN CHIEF, UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND
BEFORE THE SENATE CAUCUS ON INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL
21 SEPTEMBER 1999
INTRODUCTION
Mr. Chairman and distinguished
members of the Caucus, thank you for the opportunity to appear before
you to discuss U.S. Southern Command's role in stemming the cultivation,
production, and movement of illicit drugs in our Area of Responsibility
(AOR) with special emphasis on our counterdrug (CD) efforts in Colombia.
In my last appearance before this Caucus, I stated that we have made continued
progress in multinational CD efforts.
I also emphasized that we
must sustain our collective successes and continue to squeeze the narcotraffickers
on all fronts. Since then, we have achieved some significant successes
and some additional challenges have emerged. Today, I will provide an
update on the drug threat to U.S. interests in the region, my assessment
of the situation in Colombia, a summary of U.S. military support to CD
efforts in Colombia, a brief discussion of CD resource requirements, the
status of our regional approach, and an overview of our post Panama Theater
Architecture.
THE DRUG THREAT
The entrenched and increasingly
diverse illegal drug business continues to demonstrate an ability to meet
the world demand, and poses increasingly complex challenges to CD efforts
throughout our AOR. Cocaine and heroin continue to be a formidable industry
in the Source Zone. Coca is grown almost exclusively in the three Andean
countries of Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia. It is refined into finished
Cocaine Hydrochloride (HC1), primarily in Colombia, then transported to
world markets, primarily the United States. In 1998, an estimated 541
metric tons left the Source Zone destined for the U.S. via air, maritime
and overland routes. Multinational interdiction efforts seized approximately
147 metric tons. Despite these strong efforts, as much as 394 metric tons
arrived at distribution sites in the U.S., largely through our Southwest
Border, and Florida.
Drug Trafficking Organizations
(DTOs)
The nature and modus operandi
of DTOs are well known. Their primary strength is their ability to operate
with significant financial backing and freedom of action in the Source
and Transit Zones. Nurtured by a constant U.S. demand for their products,
these transnational criminal organizations are resilient, dynamic, and
agile. They have adapted and prospered despite the dissolution of traditional
cartels. They have proven over time that they can rapidly adjust transit
routes and modes in response to U.S. and participating nations interdiction
efforts.
Motivated by profit, DTOs
are adversely impacting Colombia's infrastructure, economy, and security
apparatus. In some areas, DTOs operate with near impunity, controlling
ports and many of the rural areas east of the Andean Ridge. Cooperation
with insurgents is an integral part of DTO "security arrangements".
These insurgent groups, in turn, have become increasingly dependent on
drug profits to arm and sustain themselves.
DTOs possess extensive resources,
which are heavily invested in legitimate businesses. Their disregard for
national sovereignty allows them to cross national frontiers without fear
of retribution and to gain unfair advantages over legitimate business
enterprises, which further undermines the civil government. Nevertheless,
DTOs are vulnerable. An effective CD effort can drive up the price of
illegal drugs causing demand to wane with a concomitant reduction in profit
to a point where drug trafficking is no longer a lucrative business.
We know DTOs make every effort
to maximize profits. They are continuing to expand cocaine production
and export to the U.S., Europe, Asia, and new secondary markets in South
America. DTOs are planting a higher yield variety of coca in the Putumayo
and Caqueta growing areas in Colombia and are expanding cocaine HC1 production
within Peru and Bolivia.
COLOMBIA
Narcotrafficking and Insurgency
The threat to Colombia is
real and immediate. It is a malignant cancer eating away at the underpinnings
of Colombia's economy and governance.
Colombia is the world's largest
producer of cocaine HC1. Lack of effective government control over more
than 50 percent of the countryside has allowed coca cultivation in Colombia
to increase by 28 percent in 1998 alone and projections indicate additional
increases in 1999. Colombia's situation is especially complex because
the sophisticated DTOs cooperate with mature insurgencies and illegal
paramilitary groups. Colombia's internal armed conflicts persist after
nearly 40 years and the loss of more than 35,000 lives on both sides.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation
Army (ELN) have become increasingly aggressive in recent months, conducting
highly publicized kidnappings and initiating clashes with Colombian Security
Forces. There were over 220 such incidents during the six-month period
from February to July of this year, highlighted by the Avianca airliner
hijacking and the abduction of churchgoers in Cali.
Strong links exist between
DTOs and the insurgents in Colombia. Thirty-six of sixty-one FARC fronts
and thirteen of fifty-two ELN fronts are known or suspected to receive
support from and protect DTOs. The ELN and FARC both profit from their
association with DTOs, particularly the FARC which is heavily dependent
on DTOs for revenues to finance their insurgent activities. Drug money
makes up a major portion of the FARC's war chest and is a primary financial
source sustaining force levels, combat operations and weapons purchases.
Today, Colombian Security
Forces confront a triangle of violence with themselves on one point, two
insurgent groups on another, and paramilitary organizations on the third.
Collectively, the FARC, ELN, and paramilitary groups threaten the democratic
and economic security of Colombia, while providing sanctuaries for thriving
DTOs. Insurgents also continue to find safe havens in Panama's Darien
Province, as well as in Venezuela, Ecuador, and to a lesser extent Peru
and Brazil.
We have long recognized that
Colombia's problems are international in dimension. The events of the
past year have crystallized this point with neighboring countries.
Spillover to Neighboring Countries
In one way or another and
to varying degrees, the problems plaguing Colombia impact each of her
five neighbors -- Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, Brazil and Panama. In the
absence of coordinated action, I believe the external effects of Colombia's
problems will continue to increase in severity. We are aggressively working
with all six countries to encourage a collective approach against a threat
they are individually incapable of defeating.
Venezuela, Ecuador and Peru
have deployed forces along their borders with Colombia to prevent or limit
intrusions by insurgents, narcotraffickers, and paramilitaries. On any
given day, Venezuela has approximately 10,000 troops routinely deployed
along the Colombian frontier. The resolution of the border dispute between
Peru and Ecuador and implementation of the peace accords have allowed
both governments to turn their attention away from fighting each other
to focusing on regional issues, such as narcotrafficking. In the case
of Ecuador, the economic crisis and civil unrest have limited President
Mahuad's options for countering the violence and corruption associated
with the drug trade. But despite economic constraints, Ecuador has increased
the number of troops and active patrols along the border with Colombia.
Brazil now openly acknowledges
that narcotraffickers and insurgents are violating its borders and that
drug use is damaging Brazilian society. Incursions by traffickers and
the FARC into the Amazon region have caused Brazil to reassess its vulnerabilities.
During the past year, the Brazilian Army has reinforced military garrisons
along the Colombian border, and the government continues to develop SIVAM,
the $1.4 billion-dollar surveillance system for the Amazon. Brazil has
also restructured its national counterdrug organization and system and
has intensified military area denial operations in the vast Amazonas State.
Panama's position is more
complicated. The abolishment of their military forces following Operation
JUST CAUSE left the country with only police forces -- the Panamanian
Public Forces (PPF). The PPF are neither manned, trained, nor equipped
to confront the heavily armed insurgent and paramilitary units that make
repeated incursions into the southern portion of the Darien Province.
The FARC enter Panamanian territory to rest and rearm. The paramilitary
organizations violate the same territory in order to seek out and destroy
FARC elements. U.S. support and mentorship provide the catalyst to help
these countries help themselves.
Colombia's Commitment to Fighting
Narcotraffickers
Colombia remains our focus
of effort for CD operations. As I stated previously, Colombia's problems
are becoming problems for the entire region. In my opinion, the focus
for addressing Colombia's internal problems must be on depriving the FARC
and ELN of the illegal revenues they receive from narcotraffickers; this
in turn will pave the way for a negotiated settlement to the four-decades
old insurgency. Tactical defeats suffered by government security forces
at the hands of the FARC in recent years have emboldened the FARC and
provided little incentive for them to engage in meaningful or substantive
peace negotiations with the Government of Colombia (GOC). However, I have
been encouraged by the performance of Colombian Security Forces during
the FARC's countrywide July offensive and in subsequent engagements. In
a number of instances, government forces inflicted substantial losses
on the FARC, and we saw encouraging levels of cooperation and coordination
among the Colombian Armed Forces (COLAF) and Colombian National Police
(CNP). To improve the GOC's position at the negotiating table, the armed
forces must continue to upgrade their combat capabilities and sustain
recently observed trends of improved performance on the battlefield.
During the Samper Administration
we provided substantial assistance to the CNP, but provided little in
the way of meaningful help to the COLAF. As a result, Colombian national
capabilities are out of balance. We must now increase the capabilities
of the armed forces without degrading the capabilities of the CNP. Though
professional and well led, the CNP are precisely what their name implies
-- they are a police force. They lack the strength in numbers and combined
arms capabilities that are required to engage FARC fronts and mobile columns
that possess army-like capabilities. This is a mission that the armed
forces and only the armed forces can and should undertake. By bringing
the capabilities of its armed forces into balance with those of the national
police, Colombia can achieve a "one-two punch" with the armed
forces preceding the police into narcotics cultivation and production
areas and setting the security conditions that are mandatory for safe
and productive execution of eradication and other counterdrug operations
by the CNP.
Despite the current high level
of violence and the increasingly complex problems associated with the
insurgents, narcotraffickers, and paramilitary groups, I remain cautiously
optimistic that Colombia, with increased U.S. support, can advance the
peace process initiated by the Pastrana administration. To succeed at
the peace table, the GOC must bargain from a position of strength, buttressed
by consistent success on the battlefield. To this end, Colombia's leaders
have undertaken initiatives to make the armed forces equal to the task
that lies before them.
Colombia continues to shoot
down and force down narcotrafficking aircraft. The Colombian Air Force
reports that during the past 18 months it interdicted at least 47 aircraft.
The Colombians destroyed 22 on the ground, shot down 4, and captured 21.
To increase its capabilities and enhance coordination with and support
to the CNP, we are working closely with the Colombian Army to create a
Counter Drug (CD) Battalion. This battalion, which is one- third again
the strength of a traditional Colombian Army Battalion, is being trained
primarily by members of our Seventh Special Forces Group at the Tolemida
garrison in southern Colombia. With organic intelligence, reconnaissance,
indirect fire, medical and other capabilities, the CD Battalion will become
fully operational during December of this year. This unit has been specifically
designed to be interoperable with the CNP and to provide the complementary
capabilities that are needed to achieve the synergy in CD operations that
I have previously described. As the CD Battalion demonstrates its effectiveness,
and I am confident it will, I will encourage Colombia's military leaders
to expand the concept and create a CD Brigade.
The success and effectiveness
of the CD Battalion and the CNP forces it supports will be largely contingent
upon the timely availability of accurate, fused, multi-source intelligence.
To ensure that quality intelligence support is available, we have embarked
on a concurrent initiative to create a Colombian Joint Intelligence Center
(COJIC) that will be co-located with the CD Battalion and Joint Task Force
(JTF) South at Tres Esquinas. By reprioritizing tasks, we have identified
sufficient Fiscal Year 1999 funds to train, equip, and provide facilities
for the COJIC. Training has already commenced and the target date for
attainment of initial operational capability is 15 December of this year.
We anticipate that these two
initiatives, in combination with a parallel training program designed
to expand and refine the operational planning capabilities of JTF South,
will bring significant improvements in the performance of Colombian Security
Forces against the crucial cocaine cultivation and production areas in
Putumayo and Caqueta Departments. As these new organizations demonstrate
their effectiveness, I anticipate they will become models for further
restructuring and refinement of Colombia's Armed Forces.
OTHER U.S. SUPPORT TO THE
CD EFFORT
While the CD Battalion and
COJIC are important initiatives that will substantially increase Colombian
Security Force capabilities to contend with the growing threat posed by
the union of narcotraffickers with insurgents and paramilitaries, they
are by no means all inclusive. We are providing assistance in other areas
as well. We are enhancing Colombian Air Force interdiction capabilities
by expanding training for pilots at the strategically significant Barranquilla
Main Operating Base. Principal focus is on improving Colombian Air Force
night interdiction posture through the provision of night vision goggles
(NVG), aircraft cockpit NVG compatibility upgrades, and aircrew NVG training.
In partnership with Office of the Secretary of Defense and the Department
of State, we are attempting to accelerate A-37 service life extension
and upgrade initiatives. These initiatives include airframe structural
repairs, avionics upgrades, integration of podded radar systems, and creation
of a two-year spare parts pipeline. Concurrently, we are striving to help
the COLAF achieve sorely needed improvements in battlefield tactical mobility.
Important breakthroughs are at hand. Using an existing foreign military
sales case, we have assisted the GOC in its efforts to purchase five UH-60
Blackhawk helicopters that are available from Sikorsky for immediate delivery.
Concurrently, we are working with the Department of State International
Narcotics and Law Enforcement to effect a no-cost lease for 18 UH-1N helicopters
recently repurchased from Canada. These aircraft are crucial, as they
will provide tactical lift for the new CD Battalion. In response to an
urgent request from the Commander of the Colombian Air Force, we have
provided and expedited delivery of ordnance items required to replenish
inventories depleted during the July FARC offensive.
We have stressed to our Colombian
and Peruvian colleagues the need to retain the strategic initiative. Past
and present airbridge interdiction operations have caused traffickers
to seek alternate routes for movement of precursor chemicals and other
materials associated with the production process. Thanks to previous strong
support from the Congress, we are aggressively implementing a five-year
program designed to create or enhance the capabilities of Peru and Colombia
to interdict traffickers on the extensive river networks that traverse
primary drug cultivation and production areas. Peru has fielded two of
12 planned Riverine Interdiction Units, and the program is now expanding
to Colombia where our goal is to roughly double the capabilities of its
already formidable riverine force. A major milestone was achieved last
month when President Pastrana personally activated the new Riverine Brigade
and its five battalions. Earlier, the Colombian Navy launched its first
indigenous support or "mothership."
U.S. Southern Command continues
to assist the Colombian Security Forces by providing essential CD training.
During this fiscal year, over 30 CD training teams have deployed to Colombia
providing training assistance to more than 1,500 members of the security
forces in such diverse subjects as light infantry training for CD field
operations, helicopter familiarization, and riverine craft handling and
safety. The command has also provided communications support and facilitated
information sharing by completing the first phase of a theater-wide communications
system that links participating nations, through our country teams, to
the Joint Interagency Task Force (JIATF) at Key West that now oversees
CD operations in both the Source and Transit Zones. As I stated in testimony
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on the Western
Hemisphere, earlier this year, I strongly commend the performance of Colombia's
military and national police leadership teams and applaud their aggressive
ongoing initiatives to restructure their forces. Additional U.S. assistance
to Colombia in the areas of increased detection and monitoring, information
sharing, equipment and training are necessary and should be pursued. Increased
U.S. support for Colombia's Armed Forces will improve their performance
on the battlefield, provide increased GOC leverage at the negotiating
table and significantly increase the chances for success of the peace
process.
These measures are additive
to the attempts to improve and better capitalize on the capabilities of
our regional partners in the Source Zone as previously discussed in this
statement. However, all of these measures taken singly or in combination
are insufficient to address what I consider to be a classic strategy to
resources mismatch. There are no villains here. Despite the best efforts
of everyone involved, the frequency, pace and tempo of higher priority
global military operations have taken a heavy toll on scarce and crucial
assets such as Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) platforms.
CD REQUIREMENTS
U.S. Southern Command lacks
the resources to fully accomplish the goals and objectives of the National
Drug Control Strategy. While the U.S. military services are tasked to
support detection and monitoring requirements with dedicated CD aircraft
and ships, out of theater contingencies, higher priority missions, and
limited availability of high demand/low density assets result in inconsistent
and inadequate support for our requirements.
Our most significant deficiency
is in the area of ISR. Lacking adequate ISR, we cannot react quickly and
effectively to changes in drug traffickers' operational patterns. U.S.
Southern Command's ISR capabilities have been seriously degraded due to
the non-availability of required assets. This has significantly reduced
the effectiveness of our CD operations. For example, during July of this
year, the FARC were able to coordinate a nearly nationwide offensive in
the second most populace nation of South America without U.S. intelligence
detecting a single concrete indicator of FARC intentions.
To compensate for inadequate
resources, we have implemented innovative tactics, techniques and procedures
(TTPs) such as pulse operations in the Caribbean to disrupt the flow of
illegal drugs. We have also deployed air assets to support surge CD operations
in Central America and in the Eastern and Western Caribbean. Simultaneously,
we have aggressively pursued closer cooperation, more complete coordination,
and expanded information exchange with Dutch, British and French forces
resident in our AOR. These efforts have paid off in the form of several
significant seizures.
A REGIONAL APPROACH TO CD
OPERATIONS
U.S. Southern Command's Theater
CD priorities are consistent with the National Drug Control Strategy and
with interagency guidance. Our number one priority is to support the Government
of Colombia in its efforts to destroy the cocaine and heroin industries
in that country.
Accordingly, Colombia remains
our focus of effort but not at the expense of forging regional and inter-regional
approaches to the narcotics trafficking threat. While continuing our support
to Colombia, we must sustain support for Peru and Bolivia to ensure they
maintain momentum in reducing coca cultivation and drug trafficking. We
cannot mortgage the successes we have achieved in these countries or alienate
neighboring countries like Brazil, Ecuador, Panama and Venezuela with
a "Colombia Only" policy.
While I subscribe to the theory
that there is no "silver bullet" for the drug problem, the effectiveness
and impact of eradication efforts in Peru and Bolivia must not be underestimated.
For the second consecutive year, we have observed significant reductions
in coca cultivation, leaf production, and base production in both countries.
As a result of forced and voluntary eradication, cultivation is down 26
percent in Peru and 17 percent in Bolivia, while leaf and cocaine production
potential has been reduced by roughly 25 percent in both countries.
Though these gains have been
partially offset by increases in all categories in Colombia, eradication
efforts in Peru and Bolivia convince me that they are making steady and
significant inroads into cocaine production at the source. At U.S. Southern
Command, we are evaluating other options (equipment and infrastructure
development) that will allow us to sustain and even further enhance the
progress Peru and Bolivia are making.
The regional riverine training
center at Iquitos, Peru, has trained more than 300 personnel from the
Peruvian National Police and Coast Guard. Graduates have been assigned
to the first of 12 Riverine Interdiction Units (RIUs) or to locally constructed
motherships that will support sustained operations by the RIUs. Heretofore,
Peru has lacked the capability to interdict narcotraffickers using the
extensive network of inland waterways. This initiative will significantly
expand Peruvian organic counterdrug capabilities and will provide them
urgently needed capabilities to assert control over rivers that have provided
traffickers an alternative to the Air Bridge. We have been monitoring
Peru closely and view with concern the steady rise of coca prices since
August of last year. The profitability threshold has been crossed, creating
the incentive for farmers to turn away from alternative crops and return
to illicit coca cultivation. Though preliminary figures indicate that
eradication is ahead of last year's pace, we must ensure that Peru continues
to receive the U.S. support and assistance it requires to preserve the
landmark progress that has been made over the past two years in reducing
coca cultivation.
Like Peru, Bolivia has made
impressive strides in its counterdrug efforts. Despite periodic resistance,
President Banzer has resolutely pursued his "Dignity Plan" and
remains steadfast in his commitment to eliminate illegal coca cultivation
by the year 2002. Progress to date has been impressive. The forced eradication
program undertaken primarily by the armed forces has met or surpassed
all established goals. To assist Bolivia in maintaining the momentum that
has been established, we must continue to provide adequate support to
each of the four pillars of the "Dignity Plan" -- prevention,
eradication, interdiction and alternative development.
THEATER ARCHITECTURE
To meet current and future
CD responsibilities, U.S. Southern Command must compensate for the loss
of U.S. bases in Panama by creating an alternative theater architecture
that will support efficient, effective and flexible CD operations into
the 21st century.
Puerto Rico has replaced Panama
as the focal point of our theater architecture. U.S. Army South recently
completed its relocation from Fort Clayton in Panama to Fort Buchanan;
Special Operations Command has displaced from its garrison locations in
Panama to its new home at Naval Station, Roosevelt Roads; our restructured
Navy Component Command, U.S. Navy Forces South, will stand up at Roosevelt
Roads later this year, and our intratheater airlift assets and other forward
deployed elements of SOUTHAF have migrated from Howard Air Force Base
to new locations in Puerto Rico and in Key West. JTF Bravo, augmented
with additional helicopter assets from the 228th Aviation Battalion remains
at Soto Cano Air Base in Honduras and continues to serve as our primary
operating location in Central America.
The loss of Howard Air Force
Base has also caused us to revisit our in-theater CD command and control
architecture. Panama-based JIATF South which previously functioned as
our principal planning and execution oversight activity for CD operations
in the Source Zone has been merged with JIATF East in Key West creating
a single operational headquarters for the planning and execution of CD
operations in both the Source and Transit zones. A similar merger has
unified the Southern Regional Operations Center (SOUTHROC) with the Caribbean
Regional Operations Center (CARIBROC). Through creative use of information
technology, this consolidated organization now gives us the capability
to "'see" from the Florida Straits deep into the Source Zone.
The final and, from a counterdrug
perspective, most critical element of the new theater architecture are
the Forward Operating Locations, or FOLs, that will fill the void created
by the loss of Howard Air Force Base. Constrained counterdrug detection,
monitoring and tracking missions are currently being conducted from FOLs
at Curacao and Aruba in the Netherlands Antilles and Manta, Ecuador. To
provide adequate coverage of the expansive Source and Transit Zones, some
level of military construction is required at each of these locations
to expand their capacities and improve operating and safety conditions.
We will also need one additional FOL in Central America to provide increased
coverage of heavily used Eastern Pacific transit routes. FOLs are a cost-effective
alternative to overseas U.S. bases. They enable us to exploit existing
host nation infrastructure to achieve levels of coverage that will equal
or exceed that which we enjoyed from Howard Air Force Base at a fraction
of the cost when measured over a 10-year period. The Manta FOL is particularly
critical as it will give us the operational reach that we need to effectively
cover Colombia, Peru and the remainder of the critical southern source
zone. A total of $122.5 million in Air Force military construction (MILCON)
funding is needed ($42.8 million in Fiscal Year 2000 and $79.7 million
in Fiscal Year 2001) to achieve the upgrades and expanded capacities that
our CD mission demands.
CONCLUSION
I have now served at U.S.
Southern Command for almost 24 months. Shortly after assuming command
and making my initial assessment of security conditions in my area of
responsibility, I asserted that Colombia was the most threatened nation
in the 32 country AOR. Today, even though I continue to stand behind that
assessment, I am cautiously optimistic about Colombia's future. My optimism
stems from several convictions, two of which I would like to share with
the Caucus. First, I have been in and out of Colombia for more than a
decade. The leadership team which now guides the country and its security
forces is the best I have seen. In Generals Tapias, Mora, Velasco, Serrano
and Admiral Garcia the armed forces and the national police are in the
hands of top flight professionals. These are senior officers who are both
competent and ethical. Their total and undivided allegiance is to Colombia.
They know what needs to be done to enable Colombia's security forces to
prevail against the narcotraffickers, insurgents and other agents of violence
who have wreaked havoc on Colombia's society and its economic wellbeing.
Second, they have set the wheels of military reform in motion and the
changes they have implemented have already borne fruit on the battlefield.
The outcomes of the country-wide offensive undertaken by the FARC during
July merit close examination. I am convinced that Colombia's security
forces emerged with the upper hand. Recent successes can be attributed
to improved intelligence preparation of the battlefield; better cooperation
between the armed forces and national police; improved air-ground coordination;
more effective command and control and competent, aggressive leadership
at both tactical and operational levels. As the new Counterdrug Battalion
achieves initial operational capability, the Colombian Joint Intelligence
Center comes on line, additional helicopters bring about urgently needed
improvements in tactical mobility, riverine forces are expanded, and anomalies
in the ratio of support to combat forces are corrected, I predict these
favorable trends will continue. While I share the widely held opinion
that the ultimate solution to Colombia's internal problems lies in negotiations,
I am convinced that success on the battlefield and the leverage that it
will provide is a precondition for meaningful and productive negotiations.
We at U.S. Southern Command are genuinely grateful to the members of the
Caucus for your support and interest in our region. We are turning the
corner in Colombia. With your continued support and assistance we can
and will resolve the two most stressing challenges to the security, stability
and prosperity of a region that is rapidly growing in importance to the
U.S. -- the national crisis in Colombia and the hemispheric crisis generated
by illegal drugs and their corrosive effects on our society and those
of our neighbors to the South.
(end text)
As of March 13, 2000, this
document is also available at http://www.usia.gov/regional/ar/colombia/wilhelm21.htm