Excerpt
from State Department Daily Briefing, March 22, 2002
Daily
Press Briefing
Philip T. Reeker, Deputy Spokesman
Washington, DC
March 22, 2002
QUESTION: The language
on Colombia is now available. I'm sure you've seen it.
MR. REEKER: Yes.
QUESTION: It's kind
of, for us, ordinary mortals, slightly obscure. I mean, I wondered if
you could expand, perhaps, on the implications of the change in language,
the change in approach to Colombia?
MR. REEKER: I think
it reflects, Jonathan, very much what we have been talking about for some
time on Colombia. The Secretary has made quite clear that we have decided
to seek new and more explicit legal authorities for Department of State
and Defense Department assistance to Colombia in support of the Government
of Colombia's unified campaign against narcotics trafficking and terrorist
activities and other threats to its national security, the threats to
democracy in Colombia.
And as you know,
we have been very supportive of President Pastrana's government and their
efforts to defend their democracy against the terrorist threats that the
FARC and other terrorist groups pose, and against the threat to Colombia,
to the region, and to us, of narco-trafficking. And I think there has
been plenty of evidence and discussion about how the two are very much
linked.
So it is obviously no surprise that our supplemental bill that was sent
yesterday to the Congress from the White House includes requests for additional
funding to Colombia. It provides $35 million in additional funding to
Colombia; $25 million of this is focused on strengthening Colombia's anti-kidnapping
capabilities in dealing with the multiple terrorist threats there; $4
million is for supporting police posts and development of civilian authorities
in areas not previously under government control; and then the additional
$6 million is to jump-start the pipeline protection program that we talked
about and put $98 million in our Fiscal Year 2003 budget.
But also pertaining
to what I said earlier, the supplemental bill, the legislation, would
allow broader authority to provide assistance to Colombia in this unified
-- I guess what we could call a cross-cutting -- threat posed by groups
that use narcotics trafficking to fund terrorist and other activities
to threaten security and undermine democracy in Colombia.
QUESTION: To follow
up, does it -- do you think this language gives you -- if approved, would
give you authority to authorize the use of the helicopters and the US-trained
brigades for use against -- directly against terrorists?
MR. REEKER: I guess
I would have to look into that specifically, if that were to come up.
The idea is to be able to use our assistance in what is clearly, as I
said, a cross-cutting threat; that is, the terrorism and the narco-trafficking
threats tend to merge in their attempts to undermine Colombian democracy.
It's something I
can look into, if that specifically would be part of that and where that
would -- obviously this is something we would be working on with the Colombians
very closely in terms of their needs and how we can be helpful.
QUESTION: Okay. And
the other thing is, since -- the pipeline protection project was originally
scheduled to start in 2003, correct? This supplemental request implies
therefore that you want to start on that this year?
MR. REEKER: I know
that the pipeline protection funding was provided for in the 2003 Fiscal
Year budget, which includes a good portion of 2002 as well. So when that
specifically was expected to start, I don't know. The purpose in asking
for $6 million in the additional funding in the supplemental bill is to
sort of jump-start that program and get it started.
QUESTION: (Inaudible)
start earlier than you expected?
MR. REEKER: I would
have to check into exactly how they want to use the additional money.
But that would be how I would interpret jump-start, to get it off to a
good jumping start.
...
QUESTION: I just
wanted to try and clarify -- did I understand you to say that $25 million
of the $35 million of the Colombian aid would be used to upgrade their
anti-kidnapping capabilities?
MR. REEKER: Let me
go back to that, just so I can tell you what we have. Yes, 25 is focused
on strengthening anti-kidnapping capabilities in terms of training/support
for forces to better fight against that. That has been a real problem
in Colombia. So part of our training, expertise, equipping -- I don't
have details on the program, but it is something that Colombia has asked
for to help them -- what we can provide to help them better protect, better
train their law enforcement authorities to prevent kidnapping.
QUESTION: So this
is US military training?
MR. REEKER: I don't
think that was ever suggested. I think we are talking about law enforcement
here. The specifics of that I could look into for you, what the program
will specifically involve. But I never saw --
QUESTION: It's a
lot of money for something that is not very clearly spelled out.
MR. REEKER: Law enforcement
training and things that -- there may be more details on it. I am happy
to look into that for you. But I think this is something the Government
of Colombia has sought, and it is a problem that we have identified as
serious and an area where we can help do that.
QUESTION: Actually
Betsy raises an interesting -- are these kidnappings by the FARC and ELN
and insurgent groups, or are you talking about run-of-the-mill abductions?
MR. REEKER: At least
from reading press reporting, and from what I know about much of the kidnapping,
it has often been sponsored by the FARC, the ELN. As you know, terrorist
groups -- that is one of their ways of trying to raise funds. It is a
terrorist act.
QUESTION: So they
are the main groups that this aid looks to help the Colombians with?
MR. REEKER: This
aid, which of course supplements our current programs and provides the
legislative -- the changes or the adjustment in the legislative language,
as the Secretary has described, to allow us to support the Colombians
in a broader way in the dual threat of terrorism and narcotics trafficking
that threatens their democracy and undermines their security.
QUESTION: Right.
It just seems to me that this is kind of way of disguising -- trying to
disguise anti -- you know, counter-insurgency stuff as -- by saying it's
anti-kidnapping because --
MR. REEKER: I don't
think anybody has tried to disguise anything, Matt. I think we have been
incredibly transparent and forthcoming in exactly how we wanted to approach
this. The Secretary has testified about it on the Hill before Congress.
We have worked with Congress, who has also been interested in seeing us
be able to help Colombia more, and that is what we will continue to do.
QUESTION: Human rights
groups have complained about aid to Colombia because of connections between
the army and paramilitaries, and the State Department report also noted
that this is a problem. Is there anything in the language of this, or
at least new aid requests, to make it clear that you are forcing the government
to deal with this issue?
MR. REEKER: As we
have been very clear, the Secretary has said on any number of occasions
that we do not intend to use additional authorities being sought to waive
either the Leahy amendment or the Byrd amendment, and we will continue
to observe the requirements of the Byrd and Leahy amendments to the Foreign
Operations Bill. That of course concerns the limits on US civilian and
military personnel in Colombia. We expect to keep within the Byrd amendment
limits that specify a maximum of 400 military and 400 civilian personnel
at any given moment. So we intend to abide by that.
And the Leahy amendment
also says that US assistance cannot be given to military units that contain
human rights violators and requires human rights certifications from the
Department of State. We also intend to abide by that.
So, as Secretary
Powell has said, we will continue to fulfill the requirements, for instance,
for Fiscal Year 2002 Foreign Operations, including the human rights certification
requirement because the promotion of human rights in Colombia is central
to US goals in that country. We will be working closely with the Congress
to meet that goal and with the Colombian Government as well.
QUESTION: Have you
certified it for this year? For 2002? Because the deadline was a while
ago, I guess.
MR. REEKER: The requirements
of the Fiscal Year 2002 act, I would have to check exactly what was when.
I don't know the dates off the top of my head, but we intend to keep up
with that. We haven't changed that language at all.
As of March 25, 2002,
this document was also available online at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2002/8901.htm