Statement
of Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), hearing of Senate Caucus on International
Narcotics Control, February 28, 2001
The
Honorable Senator Charles Grassley
Chairman
Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control
Good morning and welcome. I want to thank everyone for coming today for
this important update hearing on Plan Colombia, and for accommodating
the schedule change earlier this week.
Plan Colombia is
one of our most significant and largest Western Hemisphere foreign policy
initiatives in recent years. It is a major U.S., regional, and European
counterdrug push in Colombia, and comes about as the result of a major
expansion in cocaine and heroin production there, that is principally
targeted for the United States. Democratic institutions, regional stability,
economic development and trade, displaced persons and basic human rights
are all at risk. Let me be clear. I believe that it is important to support
Colombia. I just want to do it in the best way we know how.
I am committed to
sending the Government of Colombia the helicopters and equipment they
need to be successful against the narcotics organizations, but am concerned
about their long-term ability to fully afford and employ all the aviation
assets we are sending to their country
I am very interested
in the topics of regional spillover and what countries are you all are
most concerned with, and what should be done to assist these countries?
Venezuela, Ecuador, Panama and Brazil all neighbor Colombia. Give its
immense Amazon regions, Brazil has been mentioned as a future concern,
for both the production and transportation of narcotics.
I am also interested
in the proper balance of our programs the balance between supply
and demand reduction in the United States, between spraying and eradication
with alternate development in Colombia, and with our national strategy
between the emphasis in the source and transit zones.
I would like us to
all be realistic. Is Plan Colombias initial goal of a 50 percent
reduction in 5-6 years still valid? Is it achievable? What if we are successful?
What if we are not? What are the realistic out year costs? Is there any
present or future link between the narcotics entities in our hemisphere
and future terrorism concerns for the United States?
Finally, I want to
be sure that our priorities, our actions, the respective roles of the
U.S. and Colombia, a clear understanding of the costs and risks, the incorporation
of regional and European partners, and the time line and goals have all
been well thought out, are understand here in Washington, and actually
contribute to solving this most vexing problem of narcotics and long-term
stability for Colombia.
As of January 4,
2002, this document was also available online at http://drugcaucus.senate.gov/hearings/colombia01/grassley.html