Excerpt
from State Department Daily Briefing, July 3, 2003
QUESTION:
Another issue. It's on the announcement made by the U.S. administration
to suspend military aid to those countries, including Latin American
countries who are not -- have not agreed to exempt the U.S. soldiers
from prosecution by the International Criminal Court.
My first
question is: Mr. Chicola from Bogata announced that the U.S. restriction
on military aid will have minimal impact on Colombia. But what about
on other countries like Venezuela? From the beginning, there was a very
-- Venezuela was very concerned on the implementation of Plan Colombia.
Now, Venezuela has been sanctioned, too. Is -- this situation is not
going to increase imbalance in the region?
And my
second question is how to create a flourishing dialogue and foster a
relationship between the U.S. Government and Latin America, when the
United States is going against its principle. It's a question of principles.
MR. BOUCHER:
Well, I think, first of all, the United States is not going against
its principles. The United States is implementing its principles. And
we have a very flourishing relationship and an active dialogue with
the countries of Latin America, including on this subject of the Article
98 agreements.
It's an
important principle for the United States that those who want to adhere
to the Rome Treaty, who want to participate in the International Criminal
Court, can do so. That's their sovereign decision to do so. But they
cannot implicate others and pretend to carry out prosecutions against
others who may not be participating, especially since we have our own
legal system that deals with the same kind of crimes, and that we do
deal with the same kind of crimes. We hold our military to the highest
standards, and we don't think that we need to rely on prosecutors under
this court to decide when that needs to be done.
So this
has been a matter of principle to the United States and has been an
important element of national policy. We have a law that was passed
by our Congress that says that we won't provide military assistance
to countries who put American officials and military personnel and others
in jeopardy of this kind of prosecutorial discretion under this court.
In terms of the current fiscal year, because we're two-thirds, three-quarters
of the way through the fiscal year, most of the money in those military
programs has probably been spent, much of it has. And I had numbers
sometimes on Colombia. I did have numbers on Colombia. But the actual
amount -- if you look at our overall aid assistance to Colombia under
the Andian Regional Initiative, it's hundreds of millions of dollars.
There is about $120-$130 million of that that's military, and, of that,
this year there is only $5 million that has been captured.
Now, come
October 1st, there is a new fiscal year's worth of money, and until
these issues are resolved, we wouldn't be able to spend that. So it
is in all of our interests to continue working on these issues, continue
discussing these issues and conclude these agreements, so that we can
respect the right of others to participate in the court, and they can
respect our right not to be subject to the prosecution of prosecutorial
discretion of the court.
QUESTION:
But, in your opinion, this is not going to create an imbalance in the
region -- more aid for Colombia, less for other countries, as Venezuela?
MR. BOUCHER:
No. I don't have the numbers with me. I'd be surprised to find that
we had any substantial military assistance to Venezuela, but you can
look that up easily on the Internet to find out what the numbers are.
As of July
21, 2003, this document was also available online at http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2003/22231.htm