Speech
by Rep. Sam Farr (R-California), March 29, 2000
Mr.
FARR of California. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me
this time.
I want to rise in support
of this amendment, also as a cosponsor of the amendment. I would like
to take issue with my colleague who just pointed out that this will not
make this a better bill.
Obviously, this amendment
makes this a much better bill. In reading the amendment the beginning
says, `None of the funds appropriated in this title for military assistance
may be made available to the government of Colombia until the President
submits to Congress a certification that Colombia has done the following
things: that Colombia has agreed to implementing a strategy to eliminate
Colombia's total coca and opium poppy production by the year 2005 through
a mix of alternative development programs, by manual eradication,' and
so on.
It goes on to say, `The head
of the Colombian Armed Forces has been granted and is exercising authority
that is identical to that held by the head of the Colombian National Police
to summarily dismiss Colombian Armed Forces personnel for gross violations
of human rights.'
It goes on to say, `The Colombian
Armed Forces are assuring that they are cooperating with civilian authorities
in investigating Colombian Armed Forces personnel who have credible evidence
of gross human rights violations,' and so on.
This bill says we can have
a waiver only by the United States President. Guess what? It is the same
waiver that this Congress approved when Senator Leahy added it in the
105th and 106th Congresses. It is the same waiver that is in the law now,
is the waiver that is being repeated here.
Is it a stronger bill with
this amendment? Absolutely. I would urge all of my colleagues on both
sides of the aisle to support this amendment. It makes it a better bill
for us to make sure that if, indeed, we are going to be involved in conflict
in Colombia dealing with civilian populations, that we are going to abide
by the world standards on human rights protection, and it allows for monitoring
those protections so that we in Congress can be certified that it is doing
a good job.
I ask for support of the amendment.
As of March 30, 2000, this
document was also available online at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r106:H29MR0-173: