Speech
by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts), March 29, 2000
Mr.
McGOVERN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time.
As someone who was here during
the El Salvador debate, not as a Member, but as a staffer, I saw firsthand
how Congress trivialized the human rights issue with the passage of the
so-called El Salvador certification language. The words in the certification
amendments were always strong, always talked very passionately about human
rights; but what we saw was that each time the certification was up for
review, the Presidents who were in the White House routinely approved
that language. One of the reasons why, I think, was because we were so
much involved in that conflict in El Salvador.
I would support this amendment
if, in fact, there were not so many waivers and there were not so many
escape hatches. I would support this amendment if it truly meant what
I think the proponents of this amendment wanted it to mean, and that is
a serious statement in defense of human rights in Colombia.
The fact of the matter is,
there is nothing preventing a future President, whoever that President
will be next year, from basically ignoring everything in this amendment.
If we are serious about human rights, let us put teeth in this amendment.
I oppose this amendment.
As of March 30, 2000, this
document was also available online at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r106:H29MR0-173: