Testimony of Robert B. Charles, Assistant Secretary of State for
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, hearing of
the House Government Reform Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug
Policy, and Human Resources: "Andean Counterdrug Initiative," March
2, 2004
Robert B. Charles, Assistant Secretary for International Narcotics
and Law Enforcement Affairs
Testimony Before the House Government Reform Committee Subcommittee
on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources
Washington, DC
March 2, 2004
Mr.
Chairman, and distinguished members of the committee. Thank you
for the invitation to discuss the Andean Counterdrug Initiative
(ACI) and the State Departments continued efforts in this
critical region. The Initiative represents a significant investment
by the American people in a region that produces the vast majority
of the drugs arriving in the United States.
If
this initiative were targeted just at saving some of the 21,000
lives lost to these drugs last year, it would be the right thing
to do. But there is more to this bipartisan, multi-year initiative
than even that noble aim. It is also a bulwark against the threat
of terrorism in Colombia, Bolivia, Peru, Brazil, Venezuela, Ecuador,
and Panama. In short, it is a regional hemispheric and national
security program, with direct implications, for homeland security
and for our well being here in the continental United States.
One need only look as far as Haiti to see that drug money, and
the instability that follows it, can be institutionally corrosive,
to the point of breakdown. In Colombia, and elsewhere in the hemisphere,
the link between drug money and terrorism is incontrovertible.
All
of this reinforces the wisdom of Congress in empowering the State
Department, and the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law
Enforcement (INL) in particular, to protect Americans and our
allies in this hemisphere by strengthening the rule of law, building
law enforcement and justice sector capacity, cultivating non-drug
sources of income, and stopping heroin and cocaine from being
produced and shipped to our shores.
In the future, as in the past, strong congressional support will
be critical to fully achieving the endgame. The endgame is a hemisphere
in which drug-funded terrorism, corruption of struggling democracies
by drug traffickers along with drug violence and drug abuse from
the streets of Bogotá to the streets of Baltimore, are
reduced dramatically. We are making real progress toward that
end state, and the Andean Counterdrug Initiative is a major part
of that palpable progress.
Let
me pause here to say something unexpected. Management of these
programs is also essential. Congress provides the money, but we
at INL must provide the proper management for these program dollars.
I have a special duty, as custodian of these dollars; to make
sure they go where they are intended. Accordingly, I have ordered
a top-to-bottom program review of the entire stable of INL programming,
put penalties in government contracts, moved from cost-plus to
performance contracts, insisted that bonus justifications match
awards, imposed new performance measures, moved to multiple contracts
where possible, sat with senior executives of these contracts,
and begun reviewing past financial practices. All of this is good
government and basic oversight. It will make sure that dollars
in the ACI account go where they are intended -- to stop drug
production and drug-funded terrorism before those menaces arrive
on U.S. soil, in our towns, in our counties, in our schools.
The
investment we have made is bearing fruit drug production
is down, traffickers are being arrested and extradited, legitimate
jobs created, and the rule of law expanded. Our security, development,
and institutional assistance to the judicial and law enforcement
sectors are having a positive impact. The job is only half done,
but the results are coming in and we are approaching what may
well be a tipping point.
Background
The
strategic centerpiece of the Andean Counterdrug Initiative (ACI)
is INL programming in Colombia, the source of 90 percent of all
the cocaine reaching the United States. Colombia also provides
upwards to 70 percent of the heroin reaching our streets, and
it also is a leading supplier of cocaine to Brazil, Europe, and
points East. Besides being a producer of raw materials for cocaine
and heroin, Colombia is a major manufacturer of refined drugs.
And it is the world headquarters for major criminal and narco-terrorist
organizations. What we do in Colombia affects us in United States,
but also affects regional security and the growth of economic
opportunities for those who wish to live in democracies free from
drugs and terror.
ACI
Program Successes
Over
the past two years, long awaited ACI funds have hit the ground,
and they are making a difference. With INL support, the Colombian
Government has eradicated both coca and heroin poppy at a pace
that should begin to seriously deter future growing, even as it
wipes out larger and larger percentages of the crops that currently
become cocaine and heroin. The physical risks associated with
this program have been great, but the strategy is proving both
successful and justified. The Colombians and we have lost assets
as well as personnel to the enemy. Three hostages, who are still
in Colombia, though not INL employees, are a continuing reminder
that we are dealing with a dangerous group of terrorists who do
not respect the rules or principles of civil society.
In
2003, INL and the Colombians, working closely together, sprayed
127,000 hectares of the coca crop at 91.5 percent effectiveness,
for a net of 116,000 hectares of coca eradicated. At the same
time, alternative programs in Colombia resulted in the manual
eradication of an additional 8,441 hectares. Similarly, we sprayed
2,821 hectares in the opium regions while 1,009 hectares were
manually eradicated.
In
2002 our efforts reduced coca cultivation by 15 percent and poppy
cultivation by 25 percent. With final 2003 estimates still pending,
we can nevertheless see the beginning of the long-predicted trend.
Our efforts have brought us close to the tipping point where sustained
suppression of illegal crops and alternative employment incentives
together will convince growers that further cultivation is a futile
proposition.
Predictably,
it is also true that the work is getting more dangerous. In 2003,
INL aircraft took more than 380 hits, and we lost 4 planes. So
far this year, we have taken 29 hits on our assets. We are fully
reviewing our air wing operations to make the most effective use
of our resources and to plan for the future. Security of our air
fleet is our highest priority. We have increased intelligence
coordination and protective measures to make sure each spray mission
is as safe as humanly possible under the difficult circumstances.
If it is not safe to launch a mission, the mission does not fly.
Protecting the lives of the brave pilots who fly this program
is our highest priority. Getting results of their outlay of bravery
is the second, but sustaining the mission is first.
This
year, as of February 29, 2004, we have sprayed over 29,000 hectares
of coca and 691 hectares of poppy. This exceeds by 84 percent
the amount of coca eradicated during the same timeframe in 2003.
Our eradication goal for this has been initially set and is ambitious
in the area of both coca and opium poppy. We have worked out a
spray program in full coordination with the Colombian police and
armed forces. Depending on the 2003 final spray results, we will
review our spray targets for this year and adjust accordingly
because killing coca and deterring future cultivation is
the twin aim. And we aim to succeed.
After
2004, we expect to enter a maintenance phase of spraying smaller,
more isolated coca fields, instead of the larger fields we have
sprayed since our program began. The endgame will then involve
a ramp down to maintenance levels as the comprehensive effort
to stabilize, eradicate coca, empower people, and restore the
rule of law is achieved.
Please
make no mistake: In Colombia, ACI funds have been vital to strengthen
democracy and security. We have helped fund the establishment
of police in 158 municipalities, many of which had not seen any
government security presence in years. For the first time in history
there is now a police presence in all 1098 of Colombias
municipalities. This is an enormous step forward. To demonstrate
the hunger for security, San Mateo is a municipality that last
had a real Colombian National Police presence in June 1999, when
the FARC killed the seven San Mateo police. In April of 2003,
though, our program installed a new 46-man police department,
and San Mateo school children formed a human corridor and cheered
as the police passed by. San Mateo declared the day a holiday,
and fireworks were set off throughout the day. There is both hope
and appreciation afoot and the U.S. Congress, through leadership
and support for the ACI, can take considerable credit for that
development.
The
results are there: In 2003, Colombias murder rate dropped
by 20 percent, to its lowest figure since 1986. Colombias
illegal armed groups committed 73 massacres in 2003, as compared
to 115 in 2002. The number of victims affected by those massacres
dropped 38 percent from 680 in 2002 to 418 in 2003. Also in 2003,
2,043 cases of kidnapping were registered 32 percent fewer
than in 2002. Finally, 846 terrorist incidents were reported in
2003, a 49 percent drop over the 1,645 reported in 2002.
On
the interdiction side we continue to work closely with Colombias
armed forces and the police. Colombian forces seized 70 metric
tons of cocaine base and cocaine hydrochloride (HCl) in 2003.
In addition, 126 metric tons of cannabis were seized.
The
Air Bridge Denial program, which began last August, is starting
to become effective. Since August 2003, 10 planes suspected of
drug trafficking were forced down and 8 were destroyed. In 2003,
the program also resulted in 6.9 metric tons of drugs seized regionally.
And as of March 1, 2004, the Colombian Air Force and its regional
partners have already seized 1 metric ton of illicit drugs. But
the key here is not the number of planes destroyed. Our goal is
to effectively deter the use of Colombian airspace by traffickers
while protecting civil aviation.
I
emphasize the need to continue to work regionally. Success in
Colombia can have a ripple effect for better or worse. To be sure,
the ripple effect is positive, our programs in countries bordering
Colombia have also kept drug cultivation there at record low levels,
increased the effectiveness and coverage of drug interdiction
programs, strengthened the judiciarys ability to prosecute,
and expanded economic opportunities for the poor.
ACIs
administration of justice programs are designed to enhance the
rule of law to shift to a more effective criminal system,
protect witnesses, increase asset seizure, and protect citizens
human rights. ACI support established 34 justice and peace houses
to increase access to justice for the urban and rural poor. These
casas de justicia (justice houses) have handled over 1.8 million
cases, easing the burden on the over-taxed, inefficient judicial
system. ACI funding for administration of justice also created
19 oral trial courtrooms and trained over 6,000 lawyers, judges
and public defenders in new oral legal procedures designed to
reduce impunity and quicken the judicial process.
In
Peru and Bolivia, we have held the line on drug production so
that there has not been the balloon effect. Drug cultivation
in both countries has declined 70 percent over the past five years.
In Ecuador, our program along the northern border to boost security
and enhance economic development has prevented any significant
cultivation of drug crops in that country. Interdictions are up
throughout the area. In 2003, Perus efforts resulted in
the destruction of close to 3,762 kilograms of cocaine base, 3,250
kilograms of coca paste, and 134 metric tons of coca leaf. We
hope that a new drug interdiction coordination center, which we
are working to establish with the Government of Peru, will assist
in that effort. In Bolivia, interdiction seizures in 2003 are
up to three times as high as those for 2002 with 152 metric
tons of leaf and 12.9 metric tons of cocaine captured.
In
Bolivia, by the end of 2003, at least 25,000 Bolivian farm families
received alternative development assistance conditioned on creation
of coca-free areas. As a result, the wholesale value of legitimate
and legal agriculture leaving the Chapare exceeded $25 million.
This represents a 25 percent increase over 2002 levels. In Peru
we have also funded a key program, the "Culture of Lawfulness"
a school-based program that teaches ethics to thousands
of children in junior high school. If we can mold these young
people, we can help foster a civic belief that drugs and corruption
are wrong. Again, this is a measure of progress. Cultural education
and trust in a stable, drug-free future will take time.
In
Panama, we are meanwhile funding programs to tighten port security
and enhance that countrys ability to investigate and prosecute
financial crimes via their Financial Intelligence and Analysis
units. Our increased cooperation recently reaped rich results
with the expulsion of key Colombian traffickers to the United
States. These are a few examples of key programs that are working
in the region.
ACI
Program Challenges
We
expect our efforts in Colombia to have significant results in
the next two years, allowing Colombia to move toward full rule
of law and increasingly balanced economic development. As I noted
above, we are working regionally to prevent spillover effects
to neighboring countries. However, we face some serious challenges
in this effort.
The
first is a lack of sustained activity in terms of forced eradication
programs in Bolivia and Peru. As a result, in the Yungas region
of Bolivia, cultivation increased 26 percent last year to 23,550
hectares.
Despite
great success in the Chapare region, where cultivation dropped
15 percent from June 2002 to June 2003, the Yungas cultivation
resulted in an overall increase for the country of 17 percent
to 28,450 hectares. The Yungas area poses formidable political
and logistical challenges to a large eradication program, but
we must nevertheless, support efforts to tackle the problems in
concert with the government of President Mesa.
In
Peru, forced eradication programs are essentially limited to areas
near labs, national parks, and new cultivation. While efforts
to include a new voluntary program did help lead to a decrease
in cultivation by 15 percent last year, it is very clearly forced
eradication which will more quickly hurt the industry.
Growing
local demand for drugs in the region is another incipient problem.
These countries are painfully aware that drug consumption is on
the rise, and they have launched new programs in response with
U.S. support. Brazil, by some estimates, is the worlds second
largest consuming nation for cocaine. Brazil has initiated programs
that address its growing domestic demand as well as more aggressive
programs to protect its borders from use by drug traffickers.
We are engaged with the government of Brazil in discussions on
the major challenges it faces, and are vigorously supporting Brazils
new demand reduction emphasis.
In
FY 2005, our counternarcotics programs in Colombia will need to
build upon the historic successes of the last few years. The relationship
between drugs and terrorism in Colombia is well understood. As
President Uribe grapples with dismantling narco-terrorist groups,
we will keep our focus on the drug industry that is funding the
terrorists.
Road
Ahead
On
balance, we will need to continue to work regionally in this Hemisphere,
engaging with the key producing and transit countries in the ACI.
So long as drugs continue to flow from the area, further efforts
are needed to destroy the industry in all its forms. The traffic
undermines democracy and the rule of law and, as noted, is also
feeding increased demand for drugs in the region.
Given
poverty rates in the region, farmers will continue to be tempted
to cultivate drug crops unless they have alternative ways for
feeding their families. We will therefore work collaboratively
toward viable, economic options for Andean farmers and others
now caught in the coercive web of the violent and illegal drug
trade.
I
am encouraged to see Andean-based efforts to regionalize counterdrug
activity. With increased international cooperation and strengthening
of the law enforcement agencies among our friends abroad, Congressional-supported
INL programs will bring us closer to protecting our Andean neighbors,
as well as enhancing our own national security. We will continue
to methodically reduce the international flow of drugs and cripple
the trafficking industry whose profits feed violence, violate
the basic rule of law, stir hopelessness, and incite terrorism.
Our
FY 2005 planning continues the pursuit of vigorous eradication
and interdiction efforts to disrupt and destroy the production
and transport of drugs destined for U.S. and other markets. Our
request includes sustained funding for programs that will build
strong government institutions capable of detecting, arresting
and prosecuting processors and traffickers as well as the terrorists
that thrive with them. We intend to turn over responsibilities
to host nations, including counternarcotics training, equipment
acquisition and operation and maintenance.
That
said, I want to return to Colombia the centerpiece of our
ACI activities. We are approaching a predicted, but long-awaited
tipping point. We have local, regional, hemispheric, and bipartisan
U.S. leadership that finally sees the potential for and
is willing to press for lasting change. Congress is an
enormous part of this emerging picture. Our success is also a
result of the vision, commitment, and energy of Colombian President
Uribe. I underscore his importance to our efforts and the need
for sustained support during the remaining years of his presidency.
We are here because of all those who helped conceive and push
forward U.S. support to ACI and also because of our strong
partnership with President Uribe, whose policy goals are in exact
alignment with our own.
Concluding
Remarks
Drugs
and crime undermine democracy, rule of law, and the stability
required for economic development. The drug trade continues to
kill our young people, and the bulk of the drugs arriving in the
United States still come from the Andean region. The drug trade
also funds terrorists in this Hemisphere and other regions. These
are the stark realities.
Set
against them is our methodical ACI program, in its many parts.
And that program is producing results. Projects in Colombia, Bolivia,
Peru, Ecuador, Brazil, Venezuela, and Panama are integrated. I
am making sure that our assets are being used in the most effective
manner and that performance criteria for projects are strengthened
in order to better measure results. We have reached a tipping
point in Colombia for the first time we may be close to
delivering a lasting blow to narco-terrorists. Sustained support
for President Uribe is essential. I appreciate this Committees
strong commitment to our efforts and look forward to exchanging
views on how to carry this effort into the future. In all of this,
there is a real mission. And in the mission, there is the real
potential for lasting results that will change our world
for the better.
Thank
you.
As of
March 24, 2004, this document was also available online at http://www.state.gov/g/inl/rls/rm/30077.htm