Testimony
of Adolfo A. Franco, Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Latin America
and the Caribbean, U.S. Agency for International Development, Hearing
of the House International Relations Committee: "Plan Colombia:
Major Successes and New Challenges," May 11, 2005
Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format
Testimony
of Adolfo A. Franco,
Assistant Administrator,
Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean,
United States Agency for International Development,
before the
Committee on International Relations,
U.S. House of Representatives
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
"PLAN
COLOMBIA -- ACCOMPLISHMENTS"
Mr.
Chairman, members of the Committee, it is a pleasure again to
have the opportunity to appear before the Subcommittee on the
Western Hemisphere of the House International Relations Committee.
The last time that I appeared before this Subcommittee, on March
9, 2005, I took the opportunity to update you on the state of
democracy in the Western Hemisphere, cited examples of how the
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau
for Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is contributing to the
consolidation of democracy in the region, and identified areas
of growing concern that unless addressed now, will undermine democratic
gains in the region in the coming years. Today, I would like to
brief you on how USAID is contributing to the United States government
efforts to promote peace, democracy, and a secure environment,
alleviate poverty, and improve the criminal justice system as
essential parts of its counternarcotics program in Colombia.
Mr.
Chairman, our assistance is working and we are disrupting the
cultivation of coca and opium poppy, thus contributing to the
achievement of the president's vision for a secure, stable and
prosperous Western Hemisphere. I would also like to brief you
on opportunities for further targeted USAID assistance to the
government of Colombia (GOC) in its efforts and demonstrated resolve
to eliminate the scourge of illegal narcotics that continues to
threaten not only Colombia's social and economic fabric, but also
hemispheric stability.
I.
Major Achievements to Date
The
government of Colombia continues its relentless attack on coca
and poppy cultivation and the trade in cocaine and heroin. After
years of steady increases, cocaine production in the Andes is,
for the third straight year, decreasing. An aggressive program
of eradication, begun in earnest with the election in mid-2002
of Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, has cut Colombia's potential
cocaine production by one-third since 2001.
Started
in Fiscal Year 2001 under "Plan Colombia", the United
States government's Andean Counternarcotics Initiative (ACI) has
three goals: 1) disrupt the production and trafficking of illicit
drugs in the Andean region; 2) strengthen law enforcement and
judicial institutions that combat narco-trafficking; and 3) develop
viable alternatives to illegal drug production. Working in close
partnership with President Uribe's administration, USAID's assistance
has helped to expand and improve state presence, strengthen democracy,
help local governments deliver essential services to marginalized
Colombians, create licit economic opportunities, improve social
conditions, and resettle internally displaced people. In 2001,
it was estimated that 125,000 to 150,000 families were involved
in illicit drug production in Colombia.
Today,
I am pleased to report on several significant accomplishments
of the USAID program. The program has assisted more than 55,000
rural families who have abandoned their coca fields and are now
able to participate in licit income-generating activities throughout
Colombia. To help program participants benefit more fully from
their decision to disassociate themselves from nefarious and illegal
drug-related activities, USAID has completed more than 900 social
and productive infrastructure projects, and strengthened the administrative,
financial, accounting and auditing capabilities in 90 municipalities
to help them better serve their communities. This has given remotely
situated and largely neglected communities renewed hope and security
in the values and benefits of democracy, and the legitimacy and
reliability of state-provided services, as they now have greater
access to clean water; health delivery systems; education facilities
for both adults and children; workforce skills improvement; and
reliable markets for their high-value agricultural goods. This
has occurred in many areas where illegal armed groups used to
be the de facto authorities and previously provided only minimal
levels of social services. At today's prices, the legal agricultural
economy in the coca-growing regions is larger than the coca economy.
This
milestone achievement has been made possible through USAID's approach
to fostering expansion of trade in licit economic opportunities
as an alternative to illicit crops. We have accomplished this
by strengthening local and national institutions, NGOs, and civil
society; establishing productive infrastructure; implementing
profitable productive activities; promoting the sustainable management
of natural resources; and helping the private sector capitalize
on market opportunities to expand its trade linkages.
In
this context, building trade capacity is vital to bringing economic
stability to Colombia. Under the Colombian Agribusiness Partnership
Program (CAPP), USAID is providing resources to finance a range
of competitive agro-processing and cultivation-expansion activities,
and anticipates leveraging upwards of $200 million in private-sector
financing overall. This program is also supporting securitized
bond issuances designed to provide sustainable capital-market
financing for long-term commercial crop production and processing
projects. Additionally, under the Colombia Forestry Project, USAID
is working with farmers and agro-forestry businesses to develop
employment-intensive and environmentally sustainable, vertically
integrated forest-based enterprises.
USAID's
administration-of-justice program is helping to increase the efficiency
of Colombia's judicial sector, institutionalize a system of fair
trials, and provide greater access to justice for millions of
poor Colombians. The program has established 38 Justice Houses
(Casas de Justicia) to increase the access to justice and government
services, which have administered more than 3.1 million cases,
easing the burden on the over-stretched judicial system. Strikingly,
the Department of Justice and USAID administration-of-justice
initiatives have established 35 new oral-trial courtrooms and
trained over 1,300 lawyers, judges and public defenders in the
new accusatory criminal justice system procedures which are designed
to reduce impunity, hasten the judicial process, significantly
reduce the cost of trying a case, and enhance the overall credibility
and transparency of the judicial system.
To
protect program participants from harassment, physical harm, and
abuses by narco-traffickers and illegal armed groups, USAID assisted
with the establishment of an "Early Warning System"
(EWS) which monitors potential conditions that might trigger human
rights violations and thereby provides warnings of impending threats.
To date, more than 350 alerts have been issued by the EWS which
have resulted in 200 responses by Colombian government agencies.
To assist the government of Colombia in responding quickly to
allegations of human rights violations, USAID has helped the government
of Colombia establish 11 new mobile satellite units, several of
which are located in the most remote areas of the country. In
addition, the USAID human rights protection program has protected
more than 4,300 people, including mayors, local human rights officials,
council members, municipal human rights workers, medical workers,
and journalists. Furthermore, 87 offices under threat of violence
have been armored and made safe.
Together,
these projects are creating a civil and human rights protection
infrastructure -- and a climate of respect -- so that the Colombian
government may be able to prevent or be more responsive to human
rights violations. By providing protection to these individuals
and offices, we are playing an increasingly important role in
ensuring the ability of Colombia's leaders, human rights defenders,
and local officials to conduct activities in as secure an environment
as possible.
Another
area in which USAID's involvement has been important to President
Uribe's bold efforts to combat the influence of the drug lords
is in providing assistance to vulnerable groups, particularly
Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and victims of drug-related
violence. This assistance, administered by USAID and the State
Department's Bureau for Population, Migration, and Refugees, includes
food, shelter, psychosocial assistance, health services, community
strengthening, income and employment generation, access to education
and workforce skills training, and rehabilitation of child ex-combatants.
Our assistance is also strengthening the Colombian agency responsible
for IDP coordination, protection, and border monitoring: the Social
Security Network. The program has an impressive nation-wide presence
and runs more than 300 projects in 25 departments and 200 municipalities
throughout the country.
Colombia's
IDP problem is complex and one of the worst in the world. The
government of Colombia wants as many IDPs as possible to return
to their home communities. The USAID program facilitates the process
by: 1) restoring critical infrastructure in their home communities;
2) providing assistance to return home; and 3) helping them to
resettle in a new community if returning home is not an option.
Between 2001 and 2005, USAID's IDP program has helped more than
2.2 million persons by providing viable livelihood and employment
options. This also discourages families from resorting to the
cultivation of illicit crops. More than 52,000 jobs have been
created for IDPs and for youth at risk of displacement or recruitment
by illegal armed groups.
IDP
programs have provided vocational and skill development training
for nearly 30,000 IDPs to participate in the formal economy. More
than 800,000 displaced and vulnerable people have received quality
health services, and tens of thousands can now read and write.
Wider access to health and education is key to reducing the inequality
between those who are benefiting from democracy and those who
are not. Finally, more than 20,000 families that were willing
and able to safely return to their original communities have been
assisted, and more than 2,300 child ex-combatants have been assisted
in their economic and social reintegration process.
II.
USAID's Assistance with the GOC's Demobilization Strategy
Colombia
is at a crossroad in its efforts to greatly diminish the negative
effects of narco-terrorism and establish itself as a peaceful
nation whose citizens may benefit from sustainable social and
economic development. Recent events and progress in the demobilization
and reintegration of the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia
(AUC) represent a unique opportunity for both the government of
Colombia and the U.S. government. With our support, the Colombian
government has the chance to create a lasting peace and foment
stability within the region through the dismantling of a foreign
terrorist organization (FTO) that has been responsible for thousands
of deaths and a significant portion of the illicit drugs that
are exported from Colombia to the U.S. The Colombians want us
to be a partner in this endeavor. President Bush gave President
Uribe his pledge to continue supporting the government of Colombia's
efforts to defeat the narco-traffickers and terrorists when they
met in Cartagena earlier this year. Success with the demobilization
program will tangibly contribute to the global war on terrorism
-- the United States government's overriding foreign policy priority.
In
2003, the Colombian government and the AUC signed an accord that
called for complete demobilization of the AUC by December 31,
2005. To date, 4,820 individuals have been collectively demobilized
and are participating in the 18-to-24-month-long reintegration
process. The process is working, and this success is being reflected
by some truly remarkable results. For example, Medellin, one of
the first cities to participate in the demobilization program,
has experienced a 68 percent decline in the murder rate since
2002, with the reduction being double in areas that contain demobilized
ex-combatants as compared to areas that do not. And over 800 of
the 850 ex-combatants are working full-time for the municipality,
and many of them are also receiving formal education or training.
In
2002, Congress provided expanded authorities for the United States
government program in Colombia, recognizing that narco-trafficking
and terrorism are intertwined. The AUC has been deeply involved
in both. The Colombian government is currently finalizing negotiations
with the central command of the AUC for the demobilization of
an additional 15,000 terrorists by the end of 2005. The impact
of this on the United States government's counternarcotic and
anti-terrorism objectives in Colombia could be very significant.
The
benefits from supporting a successful AUC reincorporation process
greatly outweigh the risk or consequences of a faulty or failed
one. If the demobilized return to a life of crime, violence, and
terrorism, then the sharp drop in murders, massacres, and kidnapping
during the Uribe administration will stall, if not reverse. A
reversal in such security trends would seriously undermine President
Uribe and his Democratic Security Policy. In turn, such a failure
would damage Uribe's ability to continue to pursue his aggressive
fight against drugs and terror in Colombia. Further, one of our
strongest allies in Latin America would have suffered a serious
setback, directly affecting the prospects for continued success
in meeting critical United States government foreign policy interests
in an increasingly unstable region.
If
successful, the demobilization and reintegration process with
the AUC could also serve as a confidence-builder for future peace
negotiations with all the illegal armed groups and contribute
to a further reduction in the human rights violations and in the
internal displacement of populations resulting from the ongoing
Colombian armed conflict, as well as [reducing] drug production
and trafficking. Already there are talks underway between the
Colombian government and the National Liberation Army (ELN), another
designated foreign terrorist organization (FTO), and Colombian
officials are planning for a possible demobilization of an additional
3,000 illegal combatants this year.
The
government of Colombia has pledged over $85 million for the demobilization
and reintegration of ex-combatants during 2004-2007, but additional
resources, along with USAID "know-how," are needed to
assure its success. Employment generation and reintegration into
productive civil society is an essential component to making this
a successful and legitimate demobilization and reintegration process.
The demobilized combatants need to make a successful transition
to full-time employment, or they are at risk of falling into violence,
crime, gangs, and other illicit activities. USAID has been providing
planning assistance to the Office of the High Commissioner for
Peace, support to the Organization of American States (OAS) Monitoring
and Verification Commission, initial funding for the Tracking
and Monitoring System (TMES) and the Orientation and Reference
Centers for the demobilized, and technical assistance to improve
the vetting of ex-combatants. We have moved forward with this
preliminary institutional and infrastructure support for the demobilization
and reintegration process and would ensure that any additional
support is fully consistent with United States law. An overall
policy determination as to whether, and to what extent, to expand
our support to the process is under careful consideration. Any
demobilization structure needs to preserve certain vital principles,
such as the idea of assuring that there is no impunity for major
human rights violators and major drug traffickers.
Another
issue that has been pending since the last time I was able to
consult with the Committee in regard to demobilization and reintegration
is the status of the Truth, Justice, and Reparations Law, currently
being debated by the Colombian Congress. The Colombian government
has been working very assiduously to draft a law that balances
incentives for the paramilitaries to demobilize while simultaneously
providing the justice that is needed for Colombian society to
heal from the atrocities committed by the paramilitaries. The
balance between peace and justice is a delicate and challenging
one. However, as has been stated in several high-level government
of Colombia/United States government meetings, this must be a
Colombian solution.
The
United States should not be alone in supporting the demobilization
program, but our participation could serve as an example for other
donor nations, while at the same time bringing a sense of legitimacy
to the process. We have been working through diplomatic channels
to foster increased European Union and bilateral interest in the
paramilitary demobilization and reintegration process. Secretary
Rice also confirmed, in her April visit to Colombia, the importance
of the demobilization process and securing additional international
community support. This is a message we have been engaged in delivering,
and that is beginning to bear fruit, as demonstrated by the donation
of $957,000 from the Netherlands to the OAS Monitoring and Verification
Commission and the sponsorship by Sweden of one full-time OAS
staff member. However, the request for further international donor
support needs to continue at all levels, and we will work closely
with the Department of State and others to ensure that this is
accomplished.
III.
Future Opportunities for USAID's Assistance
Implementation
of Plan Colombia over the past two and a half years has been greatly
expedited and assisted by the determined efforts of President
Uribe. The achievements cited earlier, in remote regions of Colombia
with little or no government presence, are especially noteworthy
because of the difficult and dangerous terrain that USAID works
in and the time it takes to effect change in social and economic
behaviors. Plan Colombia is bearing fruit. The fruit of our efforts
and the determined efforts of the government of Colombia are impairing
the ability of Colombia's drug lords to influence, corrupt, and
entrap generally law-abiding people into a crime-filled world
of narcotics and terrorism. But in all candor, there is much more
to be done.
In
his remarks at an international donors' conference for Colombia
held February 3-4, 2005, in Cartagena, Colombia, USAID Administrator
Andrew Natsios noted the GOC's political will and commitment to
coca eradication and asserted that the global community, by working
together, can provide the appropriate types and levels of assistance
Colombia needs to end the drug trade and strengthen "legitimate"
state institutions in a manner that protects the rights and freedoms
of its citizens. He added that the United States will continue
to provide assistance on alternative development programs to expand
opportunities for social, economic, and democratic progress by
farmers and other individuals "caught up in illicit drug
cultivation."
The
Strategic Importance of Colombia to the United States: Colombia
is the second-oldest democracy in the Western Hemisphere and occupies
an important geo-political and strategic position. Colombia has
been an important United States government ally and trading partner
for decades, and currently about 38 percent of its export trade
is with the United States. Colombia is the largest market for
U.S. agricultural exports in South America and is also an important
market for U.S. exports of machinery, chemicals and plastics.
Our major imports from Colombia include minerals, oil, gas, coal,
precious stones, coffee, cut flowers, and woven apparel. Energy
supplies from Colombia help reduce our dependence on Middle Eastern
oil, and the United States has about $2.8 billion of foreign direct
investment in Colombia, primarily concentrated in the manufacturing,
information, and finance sectors.
But
our ties are not just economic. We have also joined with Colombia
in a common struggle against the transnational threats of narco-trafficking
and terrorism. Colombia supplies more than 80 percent of the cocaine
and much of the heroin entering the United States, which makes
the aggressive disruption of the illicit drug trade a top United
States government priority. Terrorism in Colombia both supports
and draws resources from the narcotics industry as well as from
kidnapping and extortion rings which threaten both Colombians
and Americans. The United States government cannot afford to allow
tens of thousands of well-armed and trained terrorists to operate
unimpeded in this hemisphere.
Plan
Colombia's Strategy: The strategy behind Plan Colombia was simple
-- economic development, security, and peace are inextricably
linked. Plan Colombia argued that strengthening the capacity of
the State, especially the military capability, is key to the success
of any national plan. The threats posed by narcotics traffickers
and terrorists when Plan Colombia was envisioned arose from a
combination of: insufficient resources, lack of political force,
and the debilitating impact of a weak justice system. Plan Colombia
was also based on a belief that taking away money generated by
drugs reduces the war-making capacity of narco-traffickers, criminals,
and terrorist groups -- and thereby reduces the level of violence,
which enhances the prospects for peace.
Lessons
Learned: Colombian and United States government experiences during
the last four years have shown that Plan Colombia's basic tenets
were sound, but our understanding of narco-traffickers' motivations
and behavior has grown substantially during the past four years
as we have implemented Plan Colombia and the Andean Counterdrug
Initiative (ACI) in Colombia, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru. We have
learned that illegal groups are drawn toward areas where there
is no effective state presence, and that governments must assert
control over their entire national territory and extend essential
government services to citizens in isolated areas if the narco-traffickers
and terrorists are to be defeated.
Military
and police assistance programs are an essential first step toward
establishing such government control and the presence that provides
basic security which is essential for economic and social development.
But police and military assistance alone are not sufficient. A
national government presence must include support from national
institutions that are responsible for helping local communities
gain access to basic services: security, justice, health, education,
and essential infrastructure. The institutional-strengthening
side of counternarcotics programs is consequently an essential
complement to military and police assistance if the national government
is to establish a relationship with people in isolated rural areas
and gain their allegiance after having ignored their needs for
decades. Security and essential services must then be linked with
economic and employment assistance in order to make eradication
of drug crops sustainable.
Public
diplomacy has long been recognized as an important component of
the United States government's counternarcotics efforts, but we
have seen during the past several years that our public diplomacy
programs must confront narco-trafficker propaganda to ensure that
alternative development programs are well understood by the average
citizen and that people know how narco-trafficking harms not only
the people who use drugs, but also harms their country, economy,
environment, justice system, and democracy.
Another
important lesson of the past four years is that narco-trafficking
has an important regional dimension and is not simply a national
problem. This regional dimension results from narco-traffickers'
tendency of seeking to move to new areas when they are confronted
by eradication and interdiction pressures. In the last two years,
the traffickers have been unable to make up for production losses
in Colombia by opening new areas in that country or developing
a production industry in neighboring countries. The so-called
"balloon effect" of coca and cocaine production has
not occurred on a large scale.
The
Andean Counternarcotics Initiative's regional focus has meant
that progress in Colombia has not been offset by increases in
the rest of the Andes. There has been a net decrease in the total
area cultivated in these countries for each of the past three
years, including two successive drops in Peru and modest increases
in Bolivia. Only trace amounts of coca are cultivated in neighboring
Venezuela, Ecuador, Panama, and Brazil.
The
Need for Continuation of Regional Programs: The reduction of coca
cultivation in the region has been most significant in Colombia.
Aerial eradication has impressively reduced regional production
capacity and has raised pressure on traffickers to bear the cost
of replanting and field reconstitution. It will be necessary to
carefully watch developments in newly developing coca areas in
Colombia and possibly Peru to assure that traffickers do not migrate
their production and establish a marketing infrastructure elsewhere.
As the final year of Plan Colombia comes to an end, however, success
is measurable and is a good reason to redouble efforts on programs
that have caused traffickers the greatest damage.
Narco-traffickers
and terrorists have demonstrated that they are a dangerous and
resilient force. Our successes, [up] to now, should stiffen our
resolve to confront the traffickers, who are fighting back and
reconstituting fields more rapidly than we have seen in the past.
For
the out years we are working across the government to define the
best strategy to build upon our experiences during the past four
years with Plan Colombia and the ACI. These experiences suggest
that the following concepts, programs, or activities should be
part of our follow-on efforts:
--
State presence should be expanded with support from national institutions;
--
Military and police assistance to guarantee that the government
of Colombia maintains control over key production areas and lines
of communication to disrupt large-scale coca and cocaine production;
--
Counternarcotics support for interdiction and eradication programs
that disrupt illicit drug production and increase the risks and
costs of narco-trafficking activities;
--
Alternative development support to increase licit employment and
stimulate income-earning activities;
--
Private-sector support to improve policies and increase investment
and trade opportunities;
--
Administration-of-justice activities that reduce impunity and
increase access to justice;
--
Human rights programs and activities as an essential complement
to military, police, and judicial-sector assistance;
--
Humanitarian assistance and peace initiatives as an important
outgrowth of expanded state presence.
Priorities
for Continued Colombian Assistance: President Bush and Secretary
of State Rice have both affirmed the United States government's
commitment to continue supporting Colombia in its efforts to defeat
and eliminate narco-traffickers and terrorists. The essential
elements of future United States government assistance are in
the initial stages of discussion, but will likely include many
of the same concepts, programs, and activities identified above
as part of a multi-year, regional counternarcotics strategy. One
additional area that may form part of the United States government's
future assistance to Colombia is support for Colombia's demobilization
and reintegration program. All of these topics and areas will
need to be discussed thoroughly with the Congress and reviewed
by the entire interagency community in order to establish the
framework for continued assistance to Colombia and the Andean
region.
IV.
Conclusion
Mr.
Chairman, let me conclude by stating that while we have made significant
progress in achieving our objectives under Plan Colombia, the
job is not done. We must continue our efforts. President Uribe's
courageous efforts and commitment to disrupt and destroy the illegal
drug industry are clear. However, solving Colombia's multiple
and interrelated problems, including weak institutions, is going
to require time and patience. We must stay the course, and apply
lessons learned for continued and increased effectiveness of our
integrated development program. As Secretary of State, Condoleezza
Rice stated during her visit to Colombia two weeks ago, "You
don't stop in midstream on something that has been very effective.
It took a long time to get this program started, and it's going
to take a while to eliminate the problem."
USAID's
counternarcotics development strategy must be dynamic and able
to respond quickly to changes in narco-trafficker operations.
Sustainable income creation means that economic opportunities
must be diversified beyond the coca field and employment must
be expanded where it is cost-effective to do so. Land, labor and
capital markets must be integrated to support the shift away from
illicit activities. We must continue our efforts to help Colombia
build its trade capacity and take advantage of more open markets.
President Uribe is the ideal partner with whom to work, combining
political will, vision, operational creativity, and the necessary
resources for the difficult task ahead. We must also continue
to support efforts in citizen rights, participation, and rule
of law.
I
know that we can count on the continuing support of this Committee
and the Congress to foment sustainable development in the Andean
region and combat the scourge of narco-trafficking and terrorism
in this hemisphere.
Thank
you.
As of
May 13, 2005, this document was also available online at http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2005&m=May&x=20050511161239GLnesnoM0.5845301&t=wh/wh-latest.html