Speech
by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California), June 22, 2000
Mrs.
BOXER. Mr. President, today I voted for S. 2522, the Senate version of the
Fiscal Year 2001 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act. I voted for the
bill despite serious reservations about parts of it because it also funds
some very important priorities.
First, the bill provides economic
and military assistance to some of America's most important allies, at
the level requested by the President.
The bill includes $450 million
for international family planning programs, less than requested by the
President but more than last year.
S. 2522 also provides funding
for many very important international programs, including the Peace Corps,
U.N. peacekeeping operations, refugee assistance, and antiterrorism efforts.
I am especially pleased that,
with the passage of my amendment to add $40 million, the final bill includes
$51 million for international tuberculosis control and treatment and $255
million to fight HIV/AIDS in developing countries.
Unfortunately, attached to
the foreign operations bill this year was almost $1 billion in emergency
spending for counter-narcotics efforts in Colombia. I am disappointed
that the Senate rejected an amendment offered by Senator Wellstone, which
I cosponsored, which would have transferred the military aid portion--$225
million--to domestic drug treatment programs.
We would have done more to
fight the so-called drug war by putting those dollars into proven drug
treatment programs here to reduce demand. A Rand Corporation study found
that for every dollar spent on demand reduction you have to spend 23 dollars
on supply reduction in order to get the same decrease in drug consumption.
And because I fear that the
military assistance may lead to further U.S. involvement in the 40-year-old
civil war in Colombia, I tried to offer an amendment to simply affirm
current Defense Department policy regarding activities of DoD personnel
in Colombia. This policy states that DoD funds may not be used to support
training for Colombian counter-insurgency operations, participate in law
enforcement activities or counternarcotics field missions, or join in
any activity in which counter-narcotics related hostilities are imminent.
I was not allowed a roll call
vote on my amendment because the chairman of the Appropriations Committee
made a point of order that it was legislation on an appropriations bill.
However, less than 24 hours earlier, the Senator from Alabama, Senator
Sessions, had an amendment accepted which also dealt with U.S. policy
toward Colombia, and which was also subject to the very same point of
order. But no senator objected to the Sessions amendment.
This selective enforcement
of Senate rules is a double standard and is unfair. I am particularly
bothered because I had strong concerns about the Sessions amendment. This
is another breakdown in comity and civility in the Senate, and I am very
troubled by it.
As of June 25, 2000, this document
was also available online at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r106:S22JN0-125: