 |
| Home | | |
Analyses | | |
Aid | | |
| |
| |
News | | |
| |
| |
| |
| Last
Updated:12/20/01 |
| Letter
to Secretary of State Powell from 62 U.S. organizations, December 7, 2001 The Honorable Colin Powell Secretary of State US Department of State Washington, DC December 7, 2001 Dear Secretary Powell, The undersigned organizations write to express our grave concerns about the course of US counter-narcotics efforts in Colombia. It has come to our attention that aerial fumigation of illicit crops during the past few weeks has widely targeted legal cultivations, and represents a serious setback to the crucially important development-assistance component of U.S. aid to Colombia. In the southern Colombian
state of Putumayo, the site of the recent fumigations, local farmers and
families have signed social pacts promising to eradicate their illicit
crops within twelve months of receipt of assistance. Though these pact
signers' twelve-month period has not expired - and in many cases aid has
yet to arrive - they were specifically targeted by fumigations that began
in mid-November. A report released by the Colombian field team of Witness for Peace-a U.S. organization that visited the site of fumigations in November 2001 --documents the following: Communities that signed social pacts were fumigated. The Witness for Peace investigative team in Colombia visited El Paraíso, a small group of communities in the municipality of Valle de Guamuez in Putumayo department. El Paraíso community members are among the 37,000 families in Putumayo that signed U.S.-funded alternative development pacts with the Colombian government over the course of the last year. El Paraíso signed a manual eradication pact with the government on June 1, 2001 and signed a letter of intent for an additional, optional pact on October 22, 2001. On November 13, four crop duster planes flew over El Paraíso three times, staying low to the ground and spraying throughout the communities. Further, Witness for Peace found no evidence to suggest that the National Police gathered information on which areas had social pacts underway when they researched the locations of legal and illegal crops in Putumayo.
Human health impacted. One remote community has reported that an eleven?month old baby died soon after being hit with fumigation chemicals three successive times. Although local medical personnel could not say unequivocally that the baby's death was a direct result of the fumigation chemicals, he could give no other possible explanation. The U.S. Senate recently included language in the 2002 Foreign Operations bill mandating a human health impact study of the fumigation chemicals before any new chemicals are purchased. The current spraying clearly violates that legislation's intent. Communities had not received promised alternative development assistance. The Senate version of the Foreign Operations bill also mandates that alternative development programs be in place before communities are sprayed. According to the pacts themselves, communities that sign manual eradication pacts have 12 months after the arrival of the first government aid commitments to eradicate their illicit crops. The El Paraíso pact was signed more than six months ago -- on June 1, 2001 -- yet the community has received no government assistance. Spraying was in violation of Colombian law. Witness for Peace was able to document the fumigation of family farms that contained less than one acre of coca. Colombian Law 0005 of 2000, which regulates fumigations, states that fumigation will be used on coca crop extensions of more than 5 acres. Similarly, the law states that unless food crops are being planted as "dummy crops"-food crops that are planted among coca in order to confuse the aerial spraying program-only illicit crops will be targeted; sparing food crops, pasture lands and water sources. In fact, the law states that "the application of agricultural chemicals in rural zones cannot be carried out within less than 10 meters by land and less than 100 meters by air as a security border, in relation to bodies of water, roads, nuclei of human or animal populations or any other area that requires special protection." Nevertheless, Witness for Peace found evidence to suggest that all of the above have been and are being sprayed in the current fumigation campaign, in clear violation of the law. The claim of "new coca crops" is a government excuse. In his November 14th letter, Gonzalo de Francisco charges that the fumigation is a punishment for the planting of new coca crops by the pacts' signers. While it may be true that some individuals in some communities planted new coca crops, Witness for Peace did not find this to be a generalized situation. The investigators' findings, substantiated by local government officials, supported the claim that industrial?sized producers, who had never signed pacts in the first place, planted the majority of new crops. De Francisco's letter makes no mention of the lack of government compliance with pact commitments. The U.S. role. This fumigation campaign was carried out with the cooperation of the U.S. government. A Colombian army officer in charge of one aspect of the fumigation campaign reported, "I believe the U.S. government is pushing for a new round of fumigation" as the reason for the recent spraying. Most farmers in Colombia's impoverished coca-growing zones want to stop growing coca, and are closely watching the alternative development pacts. While many are skeptical, and believe that the Bogotá government may fail them again, most hope that this U.S.-backed effort may offer a legal alternative in areas where none currently exists. The fumigation of pact signers, even before aid arrives, sends an unhelpful signal. It casts severe doubts on the pacts' viability and increases the local peasants' deep-rooted suspicion of the Colombian government's ability to deliver on its promises. The spraying is nearly certain to prove counterproductive, inspiring coca-growers to ignore the pacts and grow more coca in new zones, out of the spray planes' current reach.
Signed, Steven J. Bennett David A. Vargas Susan West Marmagas,
MPH David A. Moczulski,
OFM Terry Collingsworth Gerald Smith, Ph.D. Glenn Wiser Rachelle Schlabach
Margaret Reeves,
Ph.D. Bishop Thomas J.
Gumbleton Kevin B. Zeese Kathryn Wolford Ivette Perfecto,
Ph.D. John I. Laun Sandra Alvarez Gary Chamberlain,
Ph.D. Atossa Soltani Mary Anne Perrone Monti Aguirre Cathy Crumbley and
Father Gerry Kelly Maria Ines Martinez Virginia Pratt Paula Palmer Wes Callender Arthur Hynes Patrick Reinsborough John Pegg Neil Jeffery Rebecca Belletto Juliana Gonzalez,
Adam Isacson Arnold Newman, Ph.D.
Kimberly Stanton,
Ph.D. Wilson (Woody) Powell Kathy Thornton, RSM Gary L. Cozette
Jean E. Jackson,
Ph.D. Gabriel Camacho Sylvester L. Salcedo,
LCDR, USNR (Ret.), Joanne Rappaport,
Ph.D. Suzana Sawyer, Ph.D. Kevin Martin John Lindsay-Poland,
Coordinator and Cristina Espinel
and Barbara Gerlach Gail S. Phares Maria Hope Martha Honey Mariana Mejia Martha Pierce Scott Wright Kim Hanna Sarah C. Aird Kate Harris Gustavo Torres Bill Callahan Alice Zachmann Amber Totz Joanne Ranney cc: Ambassador Anne
Patterson, US Embassy, Bogotá Colombia |
|
|
| Asia | | |
Colombia | | |
| |
Financial Flows | | |
National Security | | |
| Center
for International Policy |