Home |
|
|
Analyses |
|
|
Aid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Updated:3/20/00
|
Plenty
of Problems, Plenty of Alternatives: The Administration’s
Aid Proposal for Colombia
Problems
with the aid proposal: 1. Continuing a failed drug policy. Colombian peasants will continue growing coca and heroin as long as rural Colombia lacks basic services, economic opportunity, and a rule of law. It’s a matter of survival. Aerial fumigation won’t change that – if anything, it will push coca-growing into more remote guerrilla-controlled areas. 2. A step closer to quagmire. The new package’s “push into southern Colombia” closely resembles counterinsurgency, activating U.S.-created units in a fiercely defended guerrilla stronghold. Our new commitment risks sucking us into a 40-year-old war in a country 50 times the size of El Salvador. 3. Threatening a fragile peace process. President Pastrana’s talks with guerrilla groups are in a delicate but promising stage. U.S. weapons and training could weaken this effort, escalating the conflict and encouraging hard-liners on both sides who want to keep fighting. More aid didn’t bring El Salvador’s FMLN to the negotiating table – talks began in 1990, ten years after U.S. aid was first increased and shortly after aid levels went down. 4. Human rights. Colombia’s army, the main beneficiary of the new aid, remains a deeply troubled institution. Despite top leaders’ good intentions, local-level military collaboration with paramilitary groups – responsible for over ¾ of violations in 1999 – remains commonplace and mostly unpunished. The new aid proposal barely mentions the paramilitaries, though they profit handsomely from the drug trade. Alternatives
to the administration’s approach: 1. Address
the real reasons Colombians grow drugs. State neglect, lawlessness
and poverty have made rural Colombia fertile ground for both armed groups
and drug-crop cultivation. The economic aspects of the administration’s
aid proposal – alternative development, judicial reform, human rights
protections, and institutional strengthening – are worthwhile and should
be increased dramatically. 2. Relief for
the displaced. Colombia’s violence has driven over 1 million from
their homes in the last four years; only Sudan and Angola have a higher
displaced population. These internal refugees’ desperation could bring
further unrest. Despite enormous need, only 1.5% of the aid proposal would
help displaced Colombians. 3. Support
the peace process. The United States could do much more to support
peace, from supporting civil-society peace initiatives to meeting with
combatants. But less than 0.3% of the aid package would support the peace
effort. For more information
contact: |
|
Asia |
|
|
Colombia |
|
|
|
|
Financial Flows |
|
|
National Security |
|
|
Center
for International Policy |