The
2004 aid request
On
January 23, 2004, nearly four months into the federal government's
fiscal year 2004, President Bush signed into law the 2004 foreign
aid bill. The legislation was combined with six other appropriations
bills, containing much federal discretionary spending. The Foreign
Operations bill (H.R. 2800), which includes most aid to Colombia,
became “Division D” of this combined “omnibus” budget legislation
(H.R. 2673).
Relevant
text from the 2004 Foreign Operations bill; version
with annotations from CIP
Relevant
text from earlier versions of House and Senate bills
and committee reports
Aid
amounts
(Estimated
total for Colombia: $424.8 million military/police aid, $150
million economic/social aid; approximately $130 million in additional
military/police aid is included in another bill, the Defense
Department Appropriations Act)
The
bill's final version gives the Bush administration most of what
it asked for, including its full $731 million request for the
“Andean Counterdrug Initiative (ACI).” Administered by
the State Department’s international narcotics bureau, the ACI
provides counter-drug military and economic aid for Colombia
and six of its neighbors (Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Panama,
Peru and Venezuela). The program contains much of the military
and economic aid that Colombia receives. In February 2004, the
administration estimated it would give Colombia $463 million
from the “Andean Counterdrug Initiative” account in 2004, $313
million of it for the military and police, the rest economic
and social assistance.
The
ACI aid contains several earmarks. Of the $731 million for the
entire Andean region, at least $257 million must fund alternative-development
and institution-building programs, with $229 million going directly
to the United States Agency for International Development instead
of passing through the State Department’s narcotics bureau.
(In June 2003, the State Department reported that it planned
to spend a combined $108.8 million on alternative-development
and administration-of-justice programs in Bolivia, Ecuador,
Panama and Peru.)
Of
this $257 million in economic aid, the bill specifies that at
least $25 million must support justice and rule of law programs
in Colombia, and an additional $13 million must support organizations
and programs to protect human rights. At least $2.5 million
must pay for “continued training, equipment, and other assistance
for the Colombian National Park Service.” (In 2003, the bill
specified $3.5 million for the park service. The 2004 bill does
not continue 2003 provisions mandating aid for a Colombian military
unit to arrest paramilitary leaders, web monitoring software
for the Colombian police, or support for the Procurador human
rights unit.)
In
addition to the ACI, Congress placed only one limit on the administration’s
request to provide Colombia with $110 million in Foreign
Military Financing (FMF, the chief non-drug military aid
program in foreign aid legislation): that $17 million of it
pay for “aircraft and related assistance for the Colombian National
Police.” In 2003, this account helped launch a program to help
Colombia’s army protect the Caño Limón-Coveñas oil pipeline
in the department of Arauca.
While
some 2004 FMF will continue to support the pipeline program,
this aid will be given more flexibly to Colombia’s security
forces. According to the Bush administration’s 2004 request,
FMF will also pay for “training, weapons, night vision goggles
and communications equipment to the Army’s elite mobile brigades
and the Special Forces brigade (FUDRA)” and “the provision of
interdiction boats, training and infrastructure improvements,
the purchase of two additional AC-47 gunships and a C-130 support
plan that will procure four C-130e aircraft and maintenance
support.”
Colombia
would get another $1.8 million in International Military
Education and Training (IMET) funding, which pays for military
and police training, in 2004. In 2003, IMET funded 590 of the
12,947 Colombian military and police personnel trained by the
United States. (The number-one training program, with 10,558
students funded, was the Defense Department’s “Section 1004”
counter-drug funding authority. This program is not even part
of the Foreign Operations funding bill; it is funded separately,
through the budget of the Department of Defense.)
Expanded
authority
The
bill continues language that first appeared in the 2002 emergency
anti-terror supplemental appropriation bill. For the duration
of fiscal year 2004, the bill expands the mission of all past
and present counter-drug aid, allowing it to be used in a “unified
campaign” against both drugs and the activities of the FARC,
ELN and AUC – in other words, allowing aid from counter-drug
funding accounts to be used for counter-insurgent (or “counter-terror”)
operations.
As
in 2003, this expanded mission is contingent on the Colombian
military’s execution of “vigorous operations” to retake territory
from paramilitary and guerrilla groups, and to respect human
rights. As in past years, U.S.-donated helicopters must be returned
if the State Department finds that Colombian forces used them
to aid or abet paramilitary groups.
Fumigation
in national parks
A
new provision allows ACI funds to support aerial herbicide fumigation
in Colombia’s national parks and reserves “if the Secretary
of State determines that it is in accordance with Colombian
laws and that there are no effective alternatives to reduce
drug cultivation in these areas.” In a June 2003 decree, the
government of President Alvaro Uribe gave a green light to herbicide
fumigation in Colombia’s parks and reserves.
Human
rights conditions
As
in 2003, twenty-five percent of the aid will be held up until
the Secretary of State certifies that the Colombian military
is complying with several human rights standards. (This is a
step down from 2001 and 2002, when all aid was subject to human
rights restrictions.)
Changes
in wording weaken some certification standards and strengthen
others. Most notable is a change in the first requirement. In
2003, the State Department had to certify that Colombia’s armed
forces are suspending members credibly alleged to have committed
gross human rights violations or to have aided and abetted paramilitaries.
In 2004, the certification only covers armed forces members
who face such allegations according to Colombia’s minister
of Defense or Procuraduría General. Allegations of internationally
recognized human rights organizations no longer meet the “credible”
standard unless corroborated by these Colombian government bodies.
Fumigation
conditions
As
in 2003, the law holds up eighty percent of funding for herbicides
until the State Department certifies that aerial fumigation
of drug crops is occurring within a series of guidelines for
health, environment, compensation for those unjustly sprayed,
and availability of alternative development “where security
permits.”
“Troop
cap”
As
in every year since 2001, the presence of U.S. military personnel
and private contractors in Colombia is again held to a maximum
of 400 each. While the “cap” only applies to U.S. personnel
in Colombia "in support of Plan Colombia," Bush Administration
officials have pledged to respect the limit – except in special
cases like search-and-rescue missions.
Peru
and Bolivia
While
since August 2003 the United States has been supporting Colombian
Air Force efforts to force down (or shoot down) aircraft suspected
of trafficking drugs and arms, similar aid to Peru remains suspended.
Procedures are still not in place to avoid accidents, such as
an April 2001 incident in which a Peruvian Air Force plane mistakenly
shot down a light aircraft carrying a family of U.S. missionaries.
The bill renews 2003 language prohibiting U.S. funding for a
renewed Peruvian air interdiction program until 30 days after
the State Department and CIA certify that “enhanced safeguards
and procedures” are in place to prevent a repeat of the 2001
tragedy.
ACI
aid to Bolivia for the first time contains specific human rights
conditions. Aid to Bolivia’s security forces is now subject
to a determination by the Secretary of State, and a report to
the congressional Appropriations Committees, that the Bolivian
military and police are respecting human rights and cooperating
with investigations and prosecutions of alleged violations.
No
notification
For
the first time in many years, Colombia does not appear on a
list of countries subject to the “regular notification procedures”
of the congressional appropriations committees. Until 2004,
the committees had to be informed in writing fifteen days before
the State Department planned to obligate an amount of previously
approved aid to Colombia. By tradition, the chairmen (and ranking
minority-party members) of the committees had the power to “place
a hold” on the tranche of aid if he or she found something to
be unacceptable. Such “holds” were frequent in the past few
years, but are unlikely in 2004.
Report
No
“Andean Counterdrug Initiative” funds can be spent until the
State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development
give Congress a report on the proposed uses of all funds “on
a country-by-country basis for each proposed program, project,
or activity.” This report is due within 45 days of the bill’s
final passage.
Previous
steps
On
October 10, 2003, the Senate approved its version of the
Foreign Operations bill, making no major changes to the Colombia
language the Senate Appropriations Committee had approved in its
July 2003 “markup.” There was no debate on aid to Colombia or
the Andean region.
The
House of Representatives met on July 23 to debate and approve
the 2004 foreign aid funding bill (H.R. 2800). The House version
would do the following:
An
hourlong discussion on U.S. policy toward Colombia took place
as representatives debated an amendment,
introduced by Reps. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) and Ike Skelton
(D-Missouri), that sought to cut $75 million from military assistance
to Colombia and move it into global HIV-AIDS programs.
- Rep.
McGovern
introduced his amendment.
- Rep.
Jim Kolbe (R-Arizona), the chairman of the Foreign Operations
Appropriations Subcommittee, spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Nita Lowey (D-New York),
the senior Democrat on the Foreign Operations Appropriations
Subcommittee, spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Cass Ballenger (R-North Carolina), the chairman of the Western
Hemisphere International Relations Subcommittee, spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Skelton, the senior Democrat on the Armed Services Committee,
spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Mark Souder (R-Indiana),the chairman of the Drug Policy
Government Reform Subcommittee, spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Rosa DeLauro (D-Connecticut) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
John Mica (R-Florida) spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
David Obey (D-Wisconsin), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations
Committee, spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Barbara Lee (D-California) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
William Delahunt (D-Massachusetts) spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Janice Schakowsky (D-Illinois) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Judy Biggert (R-Illinois) spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Mica spoke in opposition.
- Rep.
Betty McCollum (D-Minnesota) spoke in favor.
- Rep.
McGovern spoke in favor.
- Rep.
Tom Davis (R-Virginia), the chairman of the Government
Reform Committee, submitted a statement in opposition.
The
amendment failed by a largely party-line vote
of 195 in favor, 226 against.
The
Senate Appropriations Committee
met on July 17 to "mark up" (write its draft of) the
2004 foreign aid funding bill (S. 1426). The Senate version would
do the following:
Frist
amendment
On
July 10, the Senate added a resolution to the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act praising the Colombian government on the
third anniversary of the approval of the Plan Colombia aid
bill. Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tennessee) proposed
the amendment.
|
The
Full House Appropriations Committee met on July 16, to "mark
up" (write its draft of) the 2004 foreign aid funding bill.
No significant changes to the Bush Administration's request
took place.
The
House Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations "marked
up" (wrote its draft of) the 2004 foreign aid funding bill
on July 10, 2003. The subcommittee - whose Republican leadership
was reportedly under direct orders from House Speaker Dennis Hastert's
office to leave untouched the Bush Administration's aid request
for Colombia - made no changes to the request.
The
Bush Adminstration's request, submitted February 3, 2003:
Overall
numbers
The
Foreign Operations appropriation request, which includes the vast
majority of aid for the region, would provide Colombia with about
$432 million in military aid and $136 million in social and economic
aid. (The Defense budget appropriation, which includes additional
counter-drug aid, does not estimate how much aid each country
would get. In 2003, however, Colombia's military and police are
getting an estimated $149 million through the defense budget.)
76.1
percent of the Foreign Operations request is military and
police assistance; if Colombia gets defense-budget aid similar
to an average of 2002-2003 levels, the 2003 request from all sources
would be 80.3 percent military and police assistance.
Program
|
Military
/ Police Aid
|
Economic
/ Social Aid
|
International
Narcotics Control (INC
- Andean Regional Initiative)
|
$320,500,000
|
$135,700,000
|
Foreign
Military Financing (FMF)
|
$110,000,000
|
-
|
International
Military Education and Training (IMET)
|
$1,600,000
|
-
|
Foreign
Operations Budget Request Total
|
$432,100,000
|
$135,700,000
|
Defense-Budget
Counternarcotics Aid (Known as "Section
1004" and "Section
1033"), estimated by averaging 2002-2003 levels
|
$119,100,000
|
-
|
Estimated
Overall 2004 Total
|
$552,590,000
|
$135,700,000
|
Foreign
Military Financing
The
Foreign Military Financing (FMF)
program -- used in recent years mostly to provide grant military
aid to the Middle East -- would provide Colombia with $110 million
in 2003. This money continue the effort to help Colombia's army
protect the Caño
Limón-Coveñas pipeline, which runs from Arauca department
to Sucre department in northeastern Colombia. Much oil in this
pipeline belongs to Los Angeles-based Occidental Petroleum.
Not
all the FMF will go to the pipeline program, however. The State
Department's 2004 Congressional
Budget Justification for Foreign Operations describes
how it would be used.
Colombian
security forces are deficient in the key areas of mobility,
intelligence, sustainment and training. Our FMF request supports
Colombias integrated national strategy with significant
military and counternarcotics elements which depend on the Colombian
militarys ability to establish a secure environment.
We
intend to provide training, weapons, night vision goggles and
communications equipment to the Armys elite mobile brigades
and the Special Forces brigade (known by the Spanish acronym
FUDRA) in order to attack high priority narcotics and terrorist
targets. The 5th and 18th Colombian Army Brigades, being trained
in 2003 to provide protection to the Cano Limon-Covenas pipeline
will receive additional munitions, equipment and training to
continue this high profile and important mission. Other programs
envisioned with FMF funding will support the Colombian Navy
and Air Force and include the provision of interdiction boats,
training and infrastructure improvements, the purchase of two
additional AC-47 gunships and a C-130 support plan that will
procure four C-130e aircraft and maintenance support, improving
the ability of the entire Colombian military to quickly provide
forces for operations throughout the country.
Colombias
very limited combat search and rescue (CSAR)/aero medevac capability
negatively affects all air operations. Our request includes
funds to purchase CSAR and medevac-related equipment and training
for Army and Air Force aviation units, enhancing both Colombian
military abilities and force protection of U.S. personnel in
Colombia.
The
Andean Regional Initiative request
The
aid request would provide Colombia and its neighbors with an additional
$731 million in International Narcotics Control (INC)
assistance, both military/police and economic.
Country
|
Military
/ Police
|
Economic
/ Social
|
Total
|
Colombia
|
$313,000,000
|
$150,000,000
|
$463,000,000
|
Peru
|
$66,000,000
|
$50,000,000
|
$116,000,000
|
Bolivia
|
$49,000,000
|
$42,000,000
|
$91,000,000
|
Ecuador
|
$20,000,000
|
$15,000,000
|
$35,000,000
|
Brazil
|
$12,000,000
|
-
|
$12,000,000
|
Venezuela
|
$5,000,000
|
-
|
$5,000,000
|
Panama
|
$9,000,000
|
-
|
$9,000,000
|
Total
|
$474,000,000
|
$257,000,000
|
$731,000,000
|
Source
documents
|