No
Evidence to Place Cuba on the State Sponsors of Terrorism List
By
Wayne S. Smith
May 14, 2008
The Florida State Legislature has just passed a bill that would effectively shut
down travel between Florida and Cuba, thus making it extremely difficult for Cuban-Americans
to visit their families on the island. This was done, according to the legislators,
to prevent companies in Florida from dealing with any entities in so-called "State
Sponsors of Terrorism," i.e. Syria, Sudan, Iran, North Korea and Cuba.
Obviously, however, in Florida, Cuba is the only real target. It has been on the
list since 1982 and perhaps at some point in the past it should have been. But
as I pointed out definitively last year in The
National Interest, in recent years the State Department has presented no credible
evidence at all to justify its inclusion. In its annual reports, for example,
the Department claims that Cuba opposes America's counterterrorism policy and
efforts, but can point to no example of this. And we see that on the contrary,
Cuba not only condemned the 9/11 attacks and expressed solidarity with the American
people, but also signed all terrorist resolutions and offered to sign agreements
with the U.S. to cooperate in combating terrorism.
Further, we have Fidel
Castro's own statement in September of 2001, just after the 9/11 attacks,
condemning all forms of terrorism as an "ethically indefensible phenomenon
which must be eradicated." And he vowed that "the territory of Cuba
will never be used for terrorist actions against the American people."
The State Department presents no evidence that it has been.
This year's report, as did last year's, complains that Cuba provides safe haven
to members of the Basque ETA and the Colombian FARC and ELN. Again, it presents
no evidence at all that they are engaged in terrorist activities or any activities
at all objectionable to the Spanish or Colombian governments. Last
year's State Department report even acknowledged that: "There is no information
concerning terrorist activities of these or other organizations on Cuban territory
.The
United States is not aware of specific terrorist enclaves in the country."
In sum, there may be members of the ETA, FARC, and ELN in Cuba, but if they are
there legally and are not involved in terrorist activities, then how does their
presence in any way lead to the conclusion that Cuba sponsors terrorism?
The State Department's recent reports have also complained that "the Cuban
government did not attempt to track, block, or seize terrorist assets, although
the authority to do so is contained in Cuban
Law 93 against acts of terrorism."
But any good lawyer would respond to that by asking "what assets?" There
is no evidence at all that Al-Qaeda or any other terrorist organization has any
assets in Cuba. And so, there is nothing to seize. The only thing the statement
makes clear is that Cuba does have laws on the books to combat terrorism. How
is that consistent with the description of Cuba as a "terrorist state"?
There are American fugitives in Cuba, yes, just as there are Cuban fugitives in
the U.S. The extradition treaty between the two no longer functions. But there
are no American terrorists to whom Cuba is giving safe haven. The U.S., however,
cannot say the same. It is sheltering notorious terrorists such as Luis Posada
Carriles, Orlando Bosch and others. And yet, as George Bush himself has said on
a number of occasions, "those
who harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves."
Where, one must ask, does that leave George Bush?