Rethink 'war on terror' strategy, says former
MI6 head
By Oliver King and Simon Jeffery
Guardian Unlimited
Tuesday July 11, 2006
Former
head of the Secret Intelligence Service tells Guardian
Unlimited that CIA rendition flights and Guantánamo
Bay would be illegal under British law.
Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head
of the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, has criticised
two current US policies in the "global war on
terror" saying they would have been "illegal"
under British law.
Sir Richard, formerly known in Whitehall
as "C" and now master of Pembroke College,
Cambridge, singled out CIA rendition flights and the
indefinite detention of prisoners in Guantánamo
for rebuke.
Speaking at the Aspen Ideas Festival
in Colorado before an audience of global politicians,
experts and commentators last week, Sir Richard also
said the west was "doomed" unless it "reclaimed
the moral high ground".
According
to an online report on the website of the Atlantic
magazine, the co-sponsor of the conference, Sir Richard
was questioned about which policies he was referring
to when he said they "would have been illegal
under British common law".
Sir
Richard replied: the "whole Guantánamo
operation" and CIA "rendition", where
suspected terror suspects are knowingly transferred
to third countries where torture was practised.
When
contacted by Guardian Unlimited to confirm his comments
Sir Richard said he "wouldn't disassociate"
himself from the Atlantic's report and that he was
merely expressing a view that was held by many leading
UK lawyers.
"Terrorism
is an extreme form of political communication,"
he said. "You want to be sure that, in your response,
you don't end up amplifying the messages that terrorists
are trying to convey," he told his audience.
The
former British spy chief told the conference that
it was a "strategic necessity" that the
US held to its "best traditions" because
it was easier to recruit agents if they believed they
were acting in a "good cause".
"We
need to think very carefully about long-term strategy.
If we don't hold to the moral high ground in the medium
to long term it will much more difficult to conduct
a successful counter-terrorist strategy.
"The
general approach of the "war on terror"
made sense for a while after 9/11 but as time passes
it may well need adjustment," he told Guardian
Unlimited in his first on-the-record comments to a
British news organisation since leaving MI6.
He
insisted that he wasn't critical of "day-to-day"
operational necessities but wanted the wider strategy
of the "war-on-terror" to be reconfigured.
While
his view of Guantánamo is shared by many in
the British government, including the present attorney
general, Lord Goldsmith, his comments on CIA rendition
in front of an American audience are more controversial.
As
MI6 chief, Sir Richard would have maintained a very
close relationship with colleagues in the CIA, where
considerable amounts of intelligence on the terror
threat would have been shared.
His
tenure coincided with a period when it is alleged
that al-Qaida suspects were being "rendered"
to third countries and finally to Guantánamo
Bay.
Intelligence
analysts believe it is inconceivable that he didn't
know about CIA rendition flights even though the first
reports of the practice emerged as he retired from
MI6 in May 2004.
Under
the 1988 Criminal Justice Act, MI6 Officers can be
charged with a criminal offence if it is found they
have acquiesced in an act of torture even if it takes
place outside the UK.
As
the head of the Secret Intelligence Service, Sir Richard
never gave on-the-record comments and even had his
identity obscured when he gave evidence to the Hutton
inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death
of the government scientist Dr David Kelly in 2003.
He
also recommended in Aspen that when western democracies
wanted to infringe civil liberties in the name of
counter-terrorism it was better to do this through
legislation rather than executive action as this ensured
political debate and greater legitimacy.
Sir
Richard's comments were echoed by former US secretary
of state Colin Powell and Republican senator and presidential
hopeful John McCain, who told the conference that
it was time to close down Guantánamo.
In
the closing keynote session Karl Rove, President Bush's
chief political advisor, responded to the demands
for closure, saying: "And do what? When we close
Gitmo, the question is 'what do we do with the bad
guys at Gitmo?' What do you do with them?"
Sir
Richard was also asked about the minutes of a Downing
Street meeting, leaked to a newspaper, in which he
told Tony Blair in the summer of 2002 that in the
US "intelligence and facts were being fixed around
the policy" and that an invasion was "seen
as inevitable".
His
leaked comments had caused political controversy in
the United States.
According
to the Atlantic, he responded: "I am less than
two years out of government, and I have my pension.
Check out the archives in Pembroke College, Cambridge,
in a hundred years."
But
he added: "The version of that memo that is most
often quoted was not the final version."
After
33 years in the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6,
Sir Richard Dearlove was appointed head of the agency
by Robin Cook in 1999 and served as chief until 2004
during one of the agencies most turbulent and controversial
periods following 9/11 and the lead-up to the Iraq
invasion in 2003.
MI6
became embroiled in the controversy about the quality
of its intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
amid accusations that its qualified assessments were
turned into hard facts for political reasons.
As
head of the agency, Sir Richard never gave on-the-record
interviews to journalists, although he did hold private
briefings, including one with Kevin Marsh and John
Humphrys of Radio 4's Today programme, weeks before
Andrew Gilligan reported that Downing Street had "sexed-up"
its September 2002 Iraq dossier.
Copyright
Guardian Unlimited
|