Radical
change of policy is necessary
By
Jim Mullins
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
October 27, 2006
President
Bush finally displayed a chink in his armor of absolute
certainty by admitting that New York Times columnist
Thomas Friedman "may be right" in equating
public reaction to the carnage in Iraq and the response
to the Tet offensive in Vietnam. But in the same ABC
News interview, he falls back on his tired old refrain
of blaming al-Qaida for "the stepped-up violence"
and "trying to foment sectarian violence."
That
al-Qaida is responsible for the stepped-up violence
in Iraq is ridiculous. President Bush's pre-emptive
war against a predominantly Muslim nation did not
require any support from al-Qaida to energize the
insurgency. "Shock and awe" destruction
and Paul Bremer's firing of hundreds of thousands
of bread winners -- thrusting them and their dependents
into poverty -- while opening the economy to foreign
carpetbaggers on sweetheart terms did the job very
well.
And
now, President Bush is said to be pushing Prime Minister
Nuri Kamal al-Maliki's ouster over his hesitation
in signing an IMF-imposed oil law that would turn
over Iraq's oil reserves to mainly American oil companies
on punitive terms even though Iraq's oil reserves
are identified and the cost of extraction is little
more than $1 a barrel.
Bush
and his neocon advisers' arrogant rejection of the
reasoned rationale by President George H.W. Bush and
Brent Scowcroft, his national security adviser, for
not deposing Saddam Hussein in the 1991 Gulf War have
been vindicated, for the anarchy and chaos they predicted
are there for all to see.
Both
U.S. and British military commanders with extensive
Iraq experience, leaks from the Iraq Study Group,
a bipartisan committee of 10 expert foreign policy
advisers chaired by James Baker, the president's father's
secretary of State, and indisputable facts on the
ground suggest a radical change of policy will be
necessary to even begin addressing, in Baker's words,
a "helluva mess."
U.S.
Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell, charged with lowering
violence and sectarian cleansing in Baghdad, has admitted
failure. Despite 17,000 U.S. and Iraqi troops being
added on Aug. 7 in Operation Together Forward, sectarian
expulsions and violent acts have increased by 22 percent.
On
Oct. 14, British Chief of the General Staff Richard
Gannett said that Britain "should get ourselves
out soon because our presence exacerbates the security
problem." When the U.K. handed over its base
in al-Amara, it was looted and destroyed immediately
-- a harbinger of things to come.
The
news from Iraq is dire. U.S. deaths are rapidly approaching
the 3,000 mark. A respected scientific poll has found
that a median level of Iraqi violent deaths stands
at half a million. Death squads are plying their grisly
trade, with 3,000 and growing monthly victims -- many
attributed to Ministry of Internal Security personnel,
as in Saddam's time. More than a million Iraqis (who
can afford it) have fled to Syria and Jordan.
James
Baker's Iraq Study Group committee recommendations
will be a hard pill for Bush to swallow. The long
trip back to realism envisions a set timetable for
withdrawal and engagement of neighboring Syria and
Iran in the process among alternatives to present
policy.
Syrian
President Bashar Assad has proposed unconditional
negotiations with Israel to settle their differences.
After the recent Lebanese war, Israeli Defense Minister
Amir Peretz and Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter
urged peace talks, while Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni
appointed a "project manager" for Syrian
contacts.
Iran
pledged more than twice as much aid as the U.S. for
Afghan reconstruction after the U.S. invasion. A 2002
offer by the Iranians to unconditionally negotiate
all differences with the U.S. was rejected out of
hand.
Bush
opposes any negotiation or contact by us or Israel
with either nation. "Staying the course"
means war without end. Is that what the American people
want? Or do they yearn for a peaceful end to the Iraqi
debacle and healing of our relations with the rest
of the world?
Jim
Mullins is a senior fellow at the Center for International
Policy in Washington, D.C., and a resident of Delray
Beach.
Copyright
(c) 2006, South Florida Sun-Sentinel
|